Literature DB >> 1777280

Patients not seen in three years: will invitations for health checks be of benefit?

J Noakes.   

Abstract

An attempt has been made to evaluate the evidence for the likely benefit or otherwise, of the obligatory three-yearly checks as defined within the terms of service for doctors in general practice introduced to British general practitioners in April 1990. The content, interval, age groups, ethics, organizational cost, yield and outcome of the three-yearly checks are examined. No particular evidence is apparent which should deflect general practice from its present opportunistic approach to screening, and the already established national screening programmes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1777280      PMCID: PMC1371758     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  19 in total

Review 1.  Psychological costs of screening.

Authors:  T M Marteau
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-08-26

2.  Lead time in breast cancer detection and implications for periodicity of screening.

Authors:  S Shapiro; J D Goldberg; G B Hutchison
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Is routine urine testing in outpatient clinics useful?

Authors:  A G Morgan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-11-05

4.  Did the North Karelia project reduce coronary mortality?

Authors:  J T Salonen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-08-01       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Serum cholesterol, blood pressure, and mortality: implications from a cohort of 361,662 men.

Authors:  M J Martin; S B Hulley; W S Browner; L H Kuller; D Wentworth
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-10-25       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Culture, illness, and care: clinical lessons from anthropologic and cross-cultural research.

Authors:  A Kleinman; L Eisenberg; B Good
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Randomised controlled trial of general practitioner intervention in patients with excessive alcohol consumption.

Authors:  P Wallace; S Cutler; A Haines
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-09-10

8.  Can health screening damage your health?

Authors:  H G Stoate
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1989-05

9.  Promoting prevention in primary care: controlled trial of low technology, low cost approach.

Authors:  E Fullard; G Fowler; M Gray
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-04-25

10.  Invitation to attend a health check in a general practice setting: comparison of attenders and non-attenders.

Authors:  R Pill; J French; K Harding; N Stott
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1988-02
View more
  3 in total

1.  General practitioners' contract: the good, the bad, and the slippery slope.

Authors:  D R Hannay
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Balancing proactive and reactive care.

Authors:  J C Gillies; A G Baird; E M Gillies
Journal:  Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1995-09

3.  Case against targeting long term non-attenders in general practice for a health check.

Authors:  K J Thomas; J P Nicholl; M Fall; A Lowy; B T Williams
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 5.386

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.