Literature DB >> 17768193

Locking compression plate fixation of Vancouver type-B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures.

M A Buttaro1, G Farfalli, M Paredes Núñez, F Comba, F Piccaluga.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fractures occurring at or near the distal tip of a hip prosthesis with a stable femoral stem (Vancouver type-B fractures) are associated with many complications because of the inherently unstable fracture pattern. Locking compression plates use screws that lock into the plate allowing multiple points of unicortical fixation. Such unicortical fixation may lower the risk of damage to the cement mantle or a stable femoral stem during the treatment of a periprosthetic femoral fracture. The purpose of this study was to analyze clinically and radiographically a group of patients with a Vancouver type-B1 periprosthetic femoral fracture treated with open reduction and internal fixation with use of a locking compression plate.
METHODS: Fourteen consecutive patients (fourteen hips) with a Vancouver type-B1 periprosthetic femoral fracture were treated with a locking compression plate. There were five men and nine women with an average age of sixty-eight years at the time of fracture. All of the fractures occurred after a total hip arthroplasty performed with cement, and eleven of the arthroplasties were revisions. In addition to the plate, cortical strut allografts were used to stabilize five fractures. The patients were assessed clinically and radiographically.
RESULTS: The average duration of follow-up was twenty months. Eight fractures healed uneventfully at an average of 5.4 months. Three treatment constructs failed with fracture of the plate within twelve months after surgery. An additional three constructs also failed because of plate pullout. All failures except one occurred in constructs in which a cortical strut allograft had not been utilized.
CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the high failure rate in this series of patients, locking compression plates do not appear to offer advantages over other types of plates in the treatment of type-B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures. Despite the potential to preserve the cement mantle, the locked screws did not appear to offer good pullout resistance in this fracture type. We believe that supplementation with strut allografts should be used routinely if this type of locking compression plate is selected to treat these fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17768193     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.F.01224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  29 in total

Review 1.  In brief: classifications in brief: Vancouver classification of postoperative periprosthetic femur fractures.

Authors:  Greg E Gaski; Sean P Scully
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Plate failure following plate osteosynthesis in periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Authors:  Sandra Boesmueller; Sebastian F Baumbach; Marcus Hofbauer; Gerald E Wozasek
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 1.704

3.  High union rates of locking compression plating with cortical strut allograft for type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Authors:  Ingwon Yeo; Kee-Hyung Rhyu; Sang-Min Kim; Yoon-Soo Park; Seung-Jae Lim
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Biomechanical comparison of two angular stable plate constructions for periprosthetic femur fracture fixation.

Authors:  Dirk Wähnert; Richard Schröder; Martin Schulze; Peter Westerhoff; Michael Raschke; Richard Stange
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Periprosthetic fracture around a stable femoral stem treated with locking plate osteosynthesis: distal femoral locking plate alone versus with cerclage cable.

Authors:  Young-Soo Shin; Seung-Beom Han
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-01-16

6.  Postoperative periprosthetic fractures in patients with an Exeter stem due to a femoral neck fracture: cumulative incidence and surgical outcome.

Authors:  Christian Inngul; Anders Enocson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Outcomes following surgical treatment of periprosthetic femur fractures: a single centre series.

Authors:  Natasha Holder; Steve Papp; Wade Gofton; Paul E Beaulé
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Combination of low-contact cerclage wiring and osteosynthesis in the treatment of femoral fractures.

Authors:  Andrea Angelini; Concetto Battiato
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-03-17

9.  Comparison of therapeutic outcomes of periprosthetic femoral fracture between treatments employing locking and conventional plates.

Authors:  Tomonori Baba; Kazuo Kaneko; Katsuo Shitoto; Kentaro Futamura; Yuichiro Maruyama
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2012-05-17

10.  Extracortical plate fixation with new plate inserts and cerclage wires for the treatment of periprosthetic hip fractures.

Authors:  Johannes D Bastian; Andre Butscher; Gianni Bigolin; Matthias A Zumstein; Hubert P Nötzli
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.