Literature DB >> 17767514

Inhibitory control of the human dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during the anti-saccade paradigm--a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Thomas Nyffeler1, René M Müri, Y Bucher-Ottiger, Charles Pierrot-Deseilligny, Bertrand Gaymard, Sophie Rivaud-Pechoux.   

Abstract

In the anti-saccade paradigm, subjects are instructed not to make a reflexive saccade to an appearing lateral target but to make an intentional saccade to the opposite side instead. The inhibition of reflexive saccade triggering is under the control of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). The critical time interval at which this inhibition takes place during the paradigm, however, is not exactly known. In the present study, we used single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to interfere with DLPFC function in 15 healthy subjects. TMS was applied over the right DLPFC either 100 ms before the onset of the visual target (i.e. -100 ms), at target onset (i.e. 0 ms) or 100 ms after target onset (i.e. +100 ms). Stimulation 100 ms before target onset significantly increased the percentage of anti-saccade errors to both sides, while stimulation at, or after, target onset had no significant effect. All three stimulation conditions had no significant influence on saccade latency of correct or erroneous anti-saccades. These findings show that the critical time interval at which the DLPFC controls the suppression of a reflexive saccade in the anti-saccade paradigm is before target onset. In addition, the results suggest the view that the triggering of correct anti-saccades is not under direct control of the DLPFC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17767514     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05758.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  17 in total

1.  The role of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in the inhibition of stereotyped responses.

Authors:  Hiroshi Kadota; Hirofumi Sekiguchi; Shigeki Takeuchi; Makoto Miyazaki; Yutaka Kohno; Yasoichi Nakajima
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Antisaccade performance in schizophrenia patients, their first-degree biological relatives, and community comparison subjects: data from the COGS study.

Authors:  Allen D Radant; Dorcas J Dobie; Monica E Calkins; Ann Olincy; David L Braff; Kristin S Cadenhead; Robert Freedman; Michael F Green; Tiffany A Greenwood; Raquel E Gur; Ruben C Gur; Gregory A Light; Sean P Meichle; Steve P Millard; Jim Mintz; Keith H Nuechterlein; Nicholas J Schork; Larry J Seidman; Larry J Siever; Jeremy M Silverman; William S Stone; Neal R Swerdlow; Ming T Tsuang; Bruce I Turetsky; Debby W Tsuang
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Is the relationship of prosaccade reaction times and antisaccade errors mediated by working memory?

Authors:  Trevor J Crawford; Elisabeth Parker; Ivonne Solis-Trapala; Jenny Mayes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Modification of planned actions.

Authors:  Sukhvinder S Obhi; Shannon Matkovich; Sam J Gilbert
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Corrective response times in a coordinated eye-head-arm countermanding task.

Authors:  Gordon Tao; Aarlenne Z Khan; Gunnar Blohm
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Impaired control of the oculomotor reflexes in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Martijn G van Koningsbruggen; Tom Pender; Liana Machado; Robert D Rafal
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Cortical neurodynamics of inhibitory control.

Authors:  Kai Hwang; Avniel S Ghuman; Dara S Manoach; Stephanie R Jones; Beatriz Luna
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Developmental changes in cognitive control through adolescence.

Authors:  Beatriz Luna
Journal:  Adv Child Dev Behav       Date:  2009

9.  Plastic modification of anti-saccades: adaptation of saccadic eye movements aimed at a virtual target.

Authors:  Delphine Lévy-Bencheton; Laure Pisella; Roméo Salemme; Caroline Tilikete; Denis Pélisson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  A no-go related prefrontal negativity larger to irrelevant stimuli that are difficult to suppress.

Authors:  Alice M Proverbio; Marzia Del Zotto; Nicola Crotti; Alberto Zani
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 3.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.