Literature DB >> 17766996

Relative and combined performance of mammography and ultrasonography for breast cancer screening in the general population: a pilot study in Tochigi Prefecture, Japan.

Satoshi Honjo1, Jiro Ando, Takeo Tsukioka, Hiroshi Morikubo, Miyuki Ichimura, Masakatsu Sunagawa, Toshihiko Hasegawa, Teruki Watanabe, Tetsuro Kodama, Keigo Tominaga, Michizo Sasagawa, Yasuo Koyama.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer screening by mammography is thought to be effective in reducing breast cancer mortality while ultrasonography is not accepted as a population screening modality, although the latter has been suggested to be useful in detection of cancer in the dense breast, relatively more typical for a younger woman.
METHODS: Mammography with medio-lateral oblique view was offered on trial in 1999-2000 for 3453 female residents in Tochigi prefecture who also underwent clinical breast examination and ultrasonography. The municipalities that provided cancer screening were informed of the final diagnosis for women with positive findings in the screening trial by doctors who performed the diagnostic evaluation. Linkage was also made between the list of participants in the trial and registrations at Tochigi Cancer Registry for breast cancer cases diagnosed during 1999-2001.
RESULTS: Thirteen cases with breast cancer were identified during a 2-year follow-up period: 10 were diagnosed subsequent to positive finding in the trial; two were negative in the trial and diagnosed 23 and 24 months after, respectively; and one had a positive finding at the trial but was undiagnosed at first and then diagnosed 18 months after the trial. Among the 11 cases judged as positive in the trial, four were judged only by mammography while three were judged only by ultrasonography. Those mammography alone-detected cases were relatively young, at 36, 40, 47 and 54 years of age, respectively, while the ultrasonography alone-detected cases were aged 50, 55 and 68, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Combined screening with mammography and ultrasonography may be feasible. A larger study is required to evaluate relative performance of mammography and ultrasonography in detail by characteristics of examinees and their breasts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17766996     DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hym090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0368-2811            Impact factor:   3.019


  7 in total

1.  Combined performance of physical examination, mammography, and ultrasonography for breast cancer screening among Chinese women: a follow-up study.

Authors:  Y Huang; M Kang; H Li; J Y Li; J Y Zhang; L H Liu; X T Liu; Y Zhao; Q Wang; C C Li; H Lee
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Imaging studies for the early detection of breast cancer.

Authors:  Sylvia H Heywang-Köbrunner; Ingrid Schreer; Walter Heindel; Alexander Katalinic
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-08-04       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Characterization of a Test for Invasive Breast Cancer Using X-ray Diffraction of Hair-Results of a Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Gary L Corino; Peter W French; Myungae Lee; Mariam M Ajaj; Joseph Haklani; Dharmica A H Mistry; Kevin Phan; Phillip G Yuile
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2009-11-10

Review 4.  A meta-analysis of mammographic screening with and without clinical breast examination.

Authors:  Chisato Hamashima; Koji Ohta; Yoshio Kasahara; Takafumi Katayama; Tomio Nakayama; Satoshi Honjo; Koji Ohnuki
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 6.716

5.  The contribution of three-dimensional power Doppler imaging in the preoperative assessment of breast tumors: a preliminary report.

Authors:  K Kalmantis; C Dimitrakakis; Ch Koumpis; A Tsigginou; N Papantoniou; S Mesogitis; A Antsaklis
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2009

6.  Ultrasonographic evaluation of depth-width ratio (D/W) of benign and malignant mammary tumors in dogs.

Authors:  Michihito Tagawa; Eiichi Kanai; Genya Shimbo; Mikiya Kano; Hideki Kayanuma
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 1.267

7.  Performance of ultrasonography screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lei Yang; Shengfeng Wang; Liwen Zhang; Chao Sheng; Fengju Song; Ping Wang; Yubei Huang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.430

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.