Literature DB >> 17765933

Opposing influences of emotional and non-emotional distracters upon sustained prefrontal cortex activity during a delayed-response working memory task.

Florin Dolcos1, Paul Diaz-Granados, Lihong Wang, Gregory McCarthy.   

Abstract

Performance in delayed-response working memory (WM) tasks is typically associated with sustained activation in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) that spans the delay between the memoranda and the memory probe. Recent studies have demonstrated that novel distracters presented during the delay interval both affect sustained activation and impair WM performance. However, the effect of the performance-impairing distracters upon sustained dlPFC delay activity was related to the characteristics of the distracters: memoranda-confusable distracters increased delay activity, whereas memoranda-nonconfusable emotional distracters decreased delay activity. Because these different effects were observed in different studies, it is possible that different dlPFC regions were involved and the paradox is more apparent than real. To investigate this possibility, event-related fMRI data were recorded while subjects performed a WM task for faces with memoranda-confusable (novel faces) and memoranda-nonconfusable emotional (novel scenes) distracters presented during the delay interval. Consistent with previous findings, confusable face distracters increased dlPFC delay activity, while nonconfusable emotional distracters decreased dlPFC delay activity, and these opposing effects modulated activity in the same dlPFC regions. These results provide direct evidence that specific regions of the dlPFC are generally involved in mediating the effects of distraction, while showing sensitivity to the nature of distraction. These findings are relevant for understanding alterations in the neural mechanisms associated with both general impairment of cognitive control and with specific impairment in the ability to control emotional distraction, such as those observed in aging and affective disorders, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17765933     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.07.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  47 in total

1.  rTMS stimulation on left DLPFC increases the correct recognition of memories for emotional target and distractor words.

Authors:  Michela Balconi; Chiara Ferrari
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 2.  Oversimplification in the study of emotional memory.

Authors:  Kelly A Bennion; Jaclyn H Ford; Brendan D Murray; Elizabeth A Kensinger
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 2.892

3.  Performing a secondary executive task with affective stimuli interferes with decision making under risk conditions.

Authors:  Bettina Gathmann; Mirko Pawlikowski; Tobias Schöler; Matthias Brand
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2013-10-24

4.  Mechanisms of working memory disruption by external interference.

Authors:  Wesley C Clapp; Michael T Rubens; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  The influence of emotional distraction on verbal working memory: an fMRI investigation comparing individuals with schizophrenia and healthy adults.

Authors:  Michele T Diaz; George He; Syam Gadde; Carolyn Bellion; Aysenil Belger; James T Voyvodic; Gregory McCarthy
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 4.791

6.  Expectations of Task Demands Dissociate Working Memory and Long-Term Memory Systems.

Authors:  T P Zanto; W C Clapp; M T Rubens; J Karlsson; A Gazzaley
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Brain imaging investigation of the impairing effect of emotion on cognition.

Authors:  Gloria Wong; Sanda Dolcos; Ekaterina Denkova; Rajendra Morey; Lihong Wang; Gregory McCarthy; Florin Dolcos
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 1.355

8.  A Computational Model of Major Depression: the Role of Glutamate Dysfunction on Cingulo-Frontal Network Dynamics.

Authors:  Juan P Ramirez-Mahaluf; Alexander Roxin; Helen S Mayberg; Albert Compte
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  The impact of anxiety-inducing distraction on cognitive performance: a combined brain imaging and personality investigation.

Authors:  Ekaterina Denkova; Gloria Wong; Sanda Dolcos; Keen Sung; Lihong Wang; Nicholas Coupland; Florin Dolcos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Affective context interferes with cognitive control in unipolar depression: an fMRI investigation.

Authors:  Gabriel S Dichter; Jennifer N Felder; Moria J Smoski
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 4.839

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.