Literature DB >> 17764955

Fluorescent protein FRET: the good, the bad and the ugly.

David W Piston1, Gert-Jan Kremers.   

Abstract

Dynamic protein interactions play a significant part in many cellular processes. A technique that shows considerable promise in elucidating such interactions is Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET). When combined with multiple, colored fluorescent proteins, FRET permits high spatial resolution assays of protein-protein interactions in living cells. Because FRET signals are usually small, however, their measurement requires careful interpretation and several control experiments. Nevertheless, the use of FRET in cell biological experiments has exploded over the past few years. Here we describe the physical basis of FRET and the fluorescent proteins appropriate for these experiments. We also review the approaches that can be used to measure FRET, with particular emphasis on the potential artifacts associated with each approach.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17764955     DOI: 10.1016/j.tibs.2007.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci        ISSN: 0968-0004            Impact factor:   13.807


  264 in total

1.  Endonuclease G interacts with histone H2B and DNA topoisomerase II alpha during apoptosis.

Authors:  Miroslav Vařecha; Michaela Potěšilová; Pavel Matula; Michal Kozubek
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 3.396

Review 2.  Monitoring protein interactions in living cells with fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy.

Authors:  Yuansheng Sun; Nicole M Hays; Ammasi Periasamy; Michael W Davidson; Richard N Day
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.600

Review 3.  Proteins on the move: insights gained from fluorescent protein technologies.

Authors:  Atsushi Miyawaki
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 4.  Tools used to study how protein complexes are assembled in signaling cascades.

Authors:  Susan Dwane; Patrick A Kiely
Journal:  Bioeng Bugs       Date:  2011-09-01

Review 5.  Diversity in genetic in vivo methods for protein-protein interaction studies: from the yeast two-hybrid system to the mammalian split-luciferase system.

Authors:  Bram Stynen; Hélène Tournu; Jan Tavernier; Patrick Van Dijck
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 11.056

6.  Time-resolved luminescence resonance energy transfer imaging of protein-protein interactions in living cells.

Authors:  Harsha E Rajapakse; Nivriti Gahlaut; Shabnam Mohandessi; Dan Yu; Jerrold R Turner; Lawrence W Miller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Integrative structure modeling of macromolecular assemblies from proteomics data.

Authors:  Keren Lasker; Jeremy L Phillips; Daniel Russel; Javier Velázquez-Muriel; Dina Schneidman-Duhovny; Elina Tjioe; Ben Webb; Avner Schlessinger; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 5.911

8.  mTORC1 links protein quality and quantity control by sensing chaperone availability.

Authors:  Shu-Bing Qian; Xingqian Zhang; Jun Sun; Jack R Bennink; Jonathan W Yewdell; Cam Patterson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Förster resonance energy transfer as a tool to study photoreceptor biology.

Authors:  Stephanie C Hovan; Scott Howell; Paul S-H Park
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.170

10.  Application of phasor plot and autofluorescence correction for study of heterogeneous cell population.

Authors:  Henryk Szmacinski; Vladimir Toshchakov; Joseph R Lakowicz
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.170

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.