Literature DB >> 17764783

Rapid fluid resuscitation in pediatrics: testing the American College of Critical Care Medicine guideline.

Michael J Stoner1, Deborah G Goodman, Daniel M Cohen, Soledad A Fernandez, Mark W Hall.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: The 2002 American College of Critical Care Medicine (ACCM) guidelines for the resuscitation of pediatric septic shock suggest that 20 mL/kg of bolus intravenous fluid be given within 5 minutes. Of 3 commonly used, inexpensive methods of fluid delivery, we hypothesized that only use of a manual push-pull system will permit guideline adherence.
METHODS: This prospective, interventional study was open to children in the Columbus Children's Hospital Emergency Department who were ordered a 20 mL/kg nonemergent fluid bolus by their treating physician. Subjects were randomized to receive the fluid for 5 minutes by a pressure bag maintained at 300 mm Hg, by a manual push-pull system, or by gravity. Volume of fluid delivered, absolute rates of fluid delivery, and adherence to the ACCM guideline were recorded. Statistical analysis was done with both parametric and nonparametric methods.
RESULTS: Sixty children were enrolled, with 57 included in data analysis. Median volumes of fluid delivered in the study period were 20.9 mL/kg (pressure bag), 20.2 mL/kg (push-pull), and 6.2 mL/kg (gravity) (P<.0001). The ACCM guideline was met in 58% of the pressure bag group, 68% of the push-pull group, and none of the gravity group. No children weighing greater than 40 kg met the guideline in any of the groups.
CONCLUSION: The ACCM guideline for rapid fluid resuscitation is feasible for many children, especially those weighing less than 40 kg. Contrary to our hypothesis, the use of a pressure bag and a manual push-pull system both appear to be acceptable methods of rapid fluid delivery. Administration of bolus fluid by gravity likely has a limited role in acute pediatric resuscitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17764783     DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.06.482

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  11 in total

1.  Fluid Resuscitation in Pediatric Sepsis: Lack of Data Versus Lack of Equipoise.

Authors:  W Joshua Frazier; Jennifer A Muszynski
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.624

2.  Pediatric Sepsis Guidelines: Summary for resource-limited countries.

Authors:  Praveen Khilnani; Sunit Singhi; Rakesh Lodha; Indumathi Santhanam; Anil Sachdev; Krishan Chugh; M Jaishree; Suchitra Ranjit; Bala Ramachandran; Uma Ali; Soonu Udani; Rajiv Uttam; Satish Deopujari
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-01

3.  Effect of Repetitive Simulation Training on Emergency Medical Services Team Performance in Simulated Pediatric Medical Emergencies.

Authors:  Kathryn Kothari; Chelsea Zuger; Neil Desai; Jan Leonard; Michelle Alletag; Ashley Balakas; Mike Binney; Sean Caffrey; Jason Kotas; Patrick Mahar; Kelley Roswell; Kathleen M Adelgais
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2020-11-05

4.  Novel rapid infusion device for patients in emergency situations.

Authors:  Dheeraj Kapoor; Manpreet Singh
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Factors affecting pediatric isotonic fluid resuscitation efficiency: a randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of syringe size.

Authors:  Greg Harvey; Gary Foster; Asmaa Manan; Lehana Thabane; Melissa J Parker
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2013-07-24

6.  Poor Compliance with Sepsis Guidelines in a Tertiary Care Children's Hospital Emergency Room.

Authors:  Benjamin Louis Moresco; Clinton Woosley; Morris Sauter; Utpal Bhalala
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 3.418

7.  Rapid fluid administration: an evaluation of two techniques.

Authors:  Holly C Gillis; Hina Walia; Dmitry Tumin; Tarun Bhalla; Joseph D Tobias
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2018-09-17

8.  Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial comparing the efficiency of two provider-endorsed manual paediatric fluid resuscitation techniques.

Authors:  Evan T Cole; Greg Harvey; Gary Foster; Lehana Thabane; Melissa J Parker
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Translating resuscitation guidelines into practice: health care provider attitudes, preferences and beliefs regarding pediatric fluid resuscitation performance.

Authors:  Melissa J Parker; Asmaa Manan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Rapid paediatric fluid resuscitation: a randomised controlled trial comparing the efficiency of two provider-endorsed manual paediatric fluid resuscitation techniques in a simulated setting.

Authors:  Evan T Cole; Greg Harvey; Sara Urbanski; Gary Foster; Lehana Thabane; Melissa J Parker
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.