Literature DB >> 17764480

Quantifying the predictive performance of prognostic models for censored survival data with time-dependent covariates.

R Schoop1, E Graf, M Schumacher.   

Abstract

Prognostic models in survival analysis typically aim to describe the association between patient covariates and future outcomes. More recently, efforts have been made to include covariate information that is updated over time. However, there exists as yet no standard approach to assess the predictive accuracy of such updated predictions. In this article, proposals from the literature are discussed and a conditional loss function approach is suggested, illustrated by a publicly available data set.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17764480     DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00889.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  16 in total

1.  Discussion of "Predictive comparison of joint longitudinal-survival modeling: a case study illustrating competing approaches", by Hanson, Branscum and Johnson.

Authors:  Jeremy M G Taylor
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  On longitudinal prediction with time-to-event outcome: Comparison of modeling options.

Authors:  Marlena Maziarz; Patrick Heagerty; Tianxi Cai; Yingye Zheng
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Incorporating longitudinal biomarkers for dynamic risk prediction in the era of big data: A pseudo-observation approach.

Authors:  Lili Zhao; Susan Murray; Laura H Mariani; Wenjun Ju
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Predictive accuracy of covariates for event times.

Authors:  Li Chen; D Y Lin; Donglin Zeng
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2012-04-29       Impact factor: 2.445

5.  Evaluating risk of ESRD in the urban poor.

Authors:  Marlena Maziarz; R Anthony Black; Christine T Fong; Jonathan Himmelfarb; Glenn M Chertow; Yoshio N Hall
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 10.121

6.  Evaluating longitudinal markers under two-phase study designs.

Authors:  Marlena Maziarz; Tianxi Cai; Li Qi; Anna S Lok; Yingye Zheng
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 5.899

7.  Predictive comparison of joint longitudinal-survival modeling: a case study illustrating competing approaches.

Authors:  Timothy E Hanson; Adam J Branscum; Wesley O Johnson
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  Homelessness and risk of end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  Marlena Maziarz; Glenn M Chertow; Jonathan Himmelfarb; Yoshio N Hall
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2014-08

9.  Comparing predictions among competing risks models with time-dependent covariates.

Authors:  Giuliana Cortese; Thomas A Gerds; Per K Andersen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Time-dependent predictive accuracy in the presence of competing risks.

Authors:  P Saha; P J Heagerty
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.