Literature DB >> 17764376

Analytical electric field and sensitivity analysis for two microfluidic impedance cytometer designs.

T Sun1, N G Green, S Gawad, H Morgan.   

Abstract

Microfabricated impedance cytometers have been developed to measure the electrical impedance of single biological particles at high speed. A general approach to analytically solve the electric field distributions for two different designs of cytometers: parallel facing electrodes and coplanar electrodes, using the Schwarz-Christoffel Mapping method is presented. Compared to previous analytical solutions, our derivations are more systematic and solutions are more straightforward. The solutions have been validated by comparison with numerical simulations performed using the finite element method. The influences on the electric field distribution due to the variations in the geometry of the devices have been discussed. A simple method is used to determine the impedance sensitivity of the system and to compare the two electrode designs. For identical geometrical parameters, we conclude that the parallel electrodes design is more sensitive than the coplanar electrodes.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17764376     DOI: 10.1049/iet-nbt:20070019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IET Nanobiotechnol        ISSN: 1751-8741            Impact factor:   1.847


  16 in total

1.  Single-cell printing based on impedance detection.

Authors:  J Schoendube; D Wright; R Zengerle; P Koltay
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  Quantifying the volume of single cells continuously using a microfluidic pressure-driven trap with media exchange.

Authors:  Jason Riordon; Michael Nash; Wenyang Jing; Michel Godin
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 2.800

3.  Cell density detection based on a microfluidic chip with two electrode pairs.

Authors:  Yongliang Wang; Danni Chen; Xiaoliang Guo
Journal:  Biotechnol Lett       Date:  2022-09-10       Impact factor: 2.716

4.  Single-cell microfluidic impedance cytometry: from raw signals to cell phenotypes using data analytics.

Authors:  Carlos Honrado; Paolo Bisegna; Nathan S Swami; Federica Caselli
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 6.799

5.  Effect of Electrode Shape on Impedance of Single HeLa Cell: A COMSOL Simulation.

Authors:  Min-Haw Wang; Wen-Hao Chang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 6.  Microfluidic impedance flow cytometry enabling high-throughput single-cell electrical property characterization.

Authors:  Jian Chen; Chengcheng Xue; Yang Zhao; Deyong Chen; Min-Hsien Wu; Junbo Wang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Ultra-fast cell counters based on microtubular waveguides.

Authors:  Cornelius S Bausch; Christian Heyn; Wolfgang Hansen; Insa M A Wolf; Björn-Philipp Diercks; Andreas H Guse; Robert H Blick
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Single Cell Electrical Characterization Techniques.

Authors:  Muhammad Asraf Mansor; Mohd Ridzuan Ahmad
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Ultracompact three-dimensional tubular conductivity microsensors for ionic and biosensing applications.

Authors:  Cynthia S Martinez-Cisneros; Samuel Sanchez; Wang Xi; Oliver G Schmidt
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 11.189

10.  Dynamic monitoring of single cell lysis in an impedance-based microfluidic device.

Authors:  Ying Zhou; Srinjan Basu; Ernest D Laue; Ashwin A Seshia
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.838

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.