Literature DB >> 17763405

Retransplantation for hepatitis C: results of a U.S. multicenter retransplant study.

Timothy McCashland1, Kymberly Watt, Elizabeth Lyden, Leon Adams, Michael Charlton, Alastair D Smith, Brendan M McGuire, Scott W Biggins, Guy Neff, James R Burton, Hugo Vargas, John Donovan, James Trotter, Thomas Faust.   

Abstract

It is widely perceived that outcomes are relatively poor following retransplantation (reTX) for recurrent of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Transplant centers debate the utility of offering another liver to these patients. A U.S. study group was formed to retrospectively compare survival after reTX in patients with recurrent HCV (histologically proven) and those transplanted for other indications greater than 90 days after first transplantation, from 1996 to 2004. Patients were divided into 3 groups; group 1: HCV reTX (n = 43), group 2: non-HCV reTX (n = 73), and group 3: recurrent HCV but no reTX (n = 156). They were predominantly male, Caucasian, with mean age of 47.2 yr. The commonest indications for non-HCV reTX were chronic rejection (36%), hepatic artery thrombosis (31%) and recurrent primary sclerosing cholangitis (17%). Duration of hospitalization, number of intensive care unit (ICU) days, and time interval from listing to transplantation or reTX were similar between reTX groups. The 1-yr and 3-yr survival rates after reTX were also similar for HCV reTX and non-HCV reTX groups (1 yr, 69% vs. 73%; 3 yr, 49% vs. 55%). Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores were not predictive of survival from reTX. However, with a MELD score of >30 in the non HCV group, survival was <50%. In the recurrent HCV not undergoing reTX group, 30% were reevaluated for reTX but only 15% were listed for reTX and the 3-yr survival was 47%. The most common reasons for not listing for reTX were recurrent HCV within 6 months (22%), fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis (19%), and renal dysfunction (9%). In conclusion, patients retransplanted for recurrent HCV had similar 1-yr and 3-yr survival when compared to patients undergoing reTX for other indications. MELD scores were not predictive of post-reTX survival. Survival was <50% in the non-HCV reTx group with MELD score of >30. Many patients with recurrent HCV are not considered for reTX and die from recurrent disease. Copyright 2007 AASLD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17763405     DOI: 10.1002/lt.21322

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  16 in total

Review 1.  Recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplant.

Authors:  Andrew S deLemos; Paul A Schmeltzer; Mark W Russo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Management of recurrent hepatitis C following liver transplantation.

Authors:  Stevan A Gonzalez
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2010-10

3.  Fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis with hepatitis C virus treated by double filtration plasmapheresis and interferon plus ribavirin after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Teruki Miyake; Kojiro Michitaka; Yoshio Tokumoto; Shinya Furukawa; Teruhisa Ueda; Yoshiko Soga; Masanori Abe; Bunzo Matsuura; Taro Nakamura; Taiji Tohyama; Nobuaki Kobayashi; Yoichi Hiasa; Morikazu Onji
Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-01-10

4.  Significant influence of the primary liver disease on the outcomes of hepatic retransplantation.

Authors:  A Qasim; B M Zaman; J Geoghegan; D Maguire; O Traynor; J Hegarty; P A McCormick
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  Donor Factors Including Donor Risk Index Predict Fibrosis Progression, Allograft Loss, and Patient Survival following Liver Transplantation for Hepatitis C Virus.

Authors:  Arun Jesudian; Sameer Desale; Jonathan Julia; Elizabeth Landry; Christopher Maxwell; Bhaskar Kallakury; Jacqueline Laurin; Kirti Shetty
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2015-11-12

Review 6.  Natural history, treatment and prevention of hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation: past, present and future.

Authors:  Jérôme Dumortier; Olivier Boillot; Jean-Yves Scoazec
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  R753Q single-nucleotide polymorphism impairs toll-like receptor 2 recognition of hepatitis C virus core and nonstructural 3 proteins.

Authors:  Robert A Brown; Jonathon H Gralewski; Albert J Eid; Bettina M Knoll; Robert W Finberg; Raymund R Razonable
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Predictive factors for survival and score application in liver retransplantation for hepatitis C recurrence.

Authors:  Alice Tung Wan Song; Rodolphe Sobesky; Carmen Vinaixa; Jérôme Dumortier; Sylvie Radenne; François Durand; Yvon Calmus; Géraldine Rousseau; Marianne Latournerie; Cyrille Feray; Valérie Delvart; Bruno Roche; Stéphanie Haim-Boukobza; Anne-Marie Roque-Afonso; Denis Castaing; Edson Abdala; Luiz Augusto Carneiro D'Albuquerque; Jean-Charles Duclos-Vallée; Marina Berenguer; Didier Samuel
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Critical issues in the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection in methadone maintenance patients.

Authors:  David M Novick; Mary Jeanne Kreek
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 6.526

10.  Retransplantation for graft failure in chronic hepatitis C infection: a good use of a scarce resource?

Authors:  Ian A Rowe; Kerri M Barber; Rhiannon Birch; Elinor Curnow; James M Neuberger
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.