PURPOSE: The objectives of this phase II study were to evaluate the effect of radiation (XRT) on thymidine phosphorylase (TP), dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and the efficacy of capecitabine-XRT in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients received 50.4 Gy XRT with capecitabine 1,600 mg/m(2) on Monday through Friday for 6 weeks determined from our phase I study (Saif MW, Eloubeidi MA, Russo S, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:8679-8687). After capecitabine-XRT, stable and responding patients received capecitabine 2,000 mg/m(2) for 14 days every 3 weeks till progression. Restaging was performed every 9 weeks. Tumor specimens were procured with endoscopic ultrasound-fine needle aspiration before and at week 2 after capecitabine-XRT was started to evaluate the effect of XRT on TP, DPD, and TNF-alpha mRNA levels, determined by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Among 20 patients, 4 (20%) had a partial response and 13 (65%) had stable disease. Two patients underwent surgical resection (10%). The 6-month survival rate was 84%, and the 1-year survival was 58%. Grade > or =3 toxicities included nausea/vomiting (5%), thrombosis (5%), hyperbilirubinemia (5%), and grade 3 gastrointestinal bleeding (5%). TP was elevated during week 2 when compared with the pre-XRT TP (P = 0.01). However, no such effect of XRT was found either on DPD (P = 0.22) or on TNF-alpha (P = 0.6). No correlation between TP and TNF-alpha was noticed. Also, no association between TP/DPD ratio and efficacy of capecitabine was identified. CONCLUSIONS: This phase II study further confirms our phase I results and suggests that capecitabine-XRT is an effective, tolerable, and convenient alternative to an infusional 5-fluorouracil regimen for patients with pancreatic cancer. Although results support the use of capecitabine-XRT and TP was up-regulated, there appears to be additional genes associated with the response to capecitabine.
PURPOSE: The objectives of this phase II study were to evaluate the effect of radiation (XRT) on thymidine phosphorylase (TP), dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and the efficacy of capecitabine-XRT in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients received 50.4 Gy XRT with capecitabine 1,600 mg/m(2) on Monday through Friday for 6 weeks determined from our phase I study (Saif MW, Eloubeidi MA, Russo S, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:8679-8687). After capecitabine-XRT, stable and responding patients received capecitabine 2,000 mg/m(2) for 14 days every 3 weeks till progression. Restaging was performed every 9 weeks. Tumor specimens were procured with endoscopic ultrasound-fine needle aspiration before and at week 2 after capecitabine-XRT was started to evaluate the effect of XRT on TP, DPD, and TNF-alpha mRNA levels, determined by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Among 20 patients, 4 (20%) had a partial response and 13 (65%) had stable disease. Two patients underwent surgical resection (10%). The 6-month survival rate was 84%, and the 1-year survival was 58%. Grade > or =3 toxicities included nausea/vomiting (5%), thrombosis (5%), hyperbilirubinemia (5%), and grade 3 gastrointestinal bleeding (5%). TP was elevated during week 2 when compared with the pre-XRT TP (P = 0.01). However, no such effect of XRT was found either on DPD (P = 0.22) or on TNF-alpha (P = 0.6). No correlation between TP and TNF-alpha was noticed. Also, no association between TP/DPD ratio and efficacy of capecitabine was identified. CONCLUSIONS: This phase II study further confirms our phase I results and suggests that capecitabine-XRT is an effective, tolerable, and convenient alternative to an infusional 5-fluorouracil regimen for patients with pancreatic cancer. Although results support the use of capecitabine-XRT and TP was up-regulated, there appears to be additional genes associated with the response to capecitabine.
Authors: Leah M Ferrucci; Diana Bell; Jennifer Thornton; Glenda Black; Ruth McCorkle; Douglas C Heimburger; Muhammad Wasif Saif Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2010-10-22 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Michelle A Anderson; Dean E Brenner; James M Scheiman; Diane M Simeone; Nalina Singh; Matthew J Sikora; Lili Zhao; Amy N Mertens; James M Rae Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2010-08-13 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: Jessica M Grunda; John Fiveash; Cheryl A Palmer; Alan Cantor; Hassan M Fathallah-Shaykh; L Burt Nabors; Martin R Johnson Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-05-11 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Wen Wee Ma; Joseph M Herman; Antonio Jimeno; Daniel Laheru; Wells A Messersmith; Christopher L Wolfgang; John L Cameron; Timothy M Pawlik; Ross C Donehower; Michelle A Rudek; Manuel Hidalgo Journal: Transl Oncol Date: 2010-12-01 Impact factor: 4.243
Authors: M Michael; T Price; S Y Ngan; V Ganju; A H Strickland; A Muller; K Khamly; A D Milner; J Dilulio; A Matera; J R Zalcberg; T Leong Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2008-12-16 Impact factor: 7.640