Literature DB >> 17761708

Participation in screening colonoscopy in first-degree relatives from patients with colorectal cancer.

F Ruthotto1, F Papendorf, G Wegener, G Unger, B Dlugosch, F Korangy, M P Manns, T F Greten.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend screening colonoscopy in first-degree relatives of patients with colon cancer. The aim of this state-wide study was to investigate the compliance for colonoscopic in first-degree relatives, who were younger than 60 years of age.
METHODS: A total of 602 patients were identified from the tumor registry of the public health insurance of Lower Saxony. A questionnaire was sent to these patients, which included a number of different questions regarding their knowledge about the risk of colon cancer for their family members, as well as their participation in screening colonoscopy.
RESULTS: Data from 442 patients and their first-degree relatives (1005 siblings and 354 parents) were available; 178 parents had undergone screening colonoscopy and 344 siblings. Interestingly, the percentage of siblings who underwent screening colonoscopy was significantly higher (27%) among those siblings where the index patients were aware of the increased risk for the first-degree relatives, in contrast to the siblings of the index patients who were not aware of this risk (20%).
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that only a minority of first-degree relatives undergo screening colonoscopy and that informing patients about the potential risk for their relatives will increase participation in screening colonoscopy in first-degree relatives of the patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17761708     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdm200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  17 in total

1.  Invitation to Screening Colonoscopy in the Population at Familial Risk for Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Alexander Bauer; Jürgen F Riemann; Thomas Seufferlein; Max Reinshagen; Stephan Hollerbach; Ulrike Haug; Susanne Unverzagt; Stephanie Boese; Madeleine Ritter-Herschbach; Patrick Jahn; Thomas Frese; Michael Harris; Margarete Landenberger
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Barrier-focused intervention to increase colonoscopy attendance among nonadherent high-risk populations.

Authors:  Wen Meng; Xi-Wen Bi; Xiao-Yin Bai; Hua-Feng Pan; Shan-Rong Cai; Qi Zhao; Su-Zhan Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  A randomized trial to increase colonoscopy screening in members of high-risk families in the colorectal cancer family registry and cancer genetics network.

Authors:  Jan T Lowery; Nora Horick; Anita Y Kinney; Dianne M Finkelstein; Kathleen Garrett; Robert W Haile; Noralane M Lindor; Polly A Newcomb; Robert S Sandler; Carol Burke; Deirdre A Hill; Dennis J Ahnen
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Screening practices of unaffected people at familial risk of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Driss Ait Ouakrim; Alex Boussioutas; Trevor Lockett; Ingrid Winship; Graham G Giles; Louisa B Flander; Louise Keogh; John L Hopper; Mark A Jenkins
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2011-10-26

5.  Do individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer adhere to medical recommendations for the prevention of colorectal cancer?

Authors:  Karen Bronner; Ilse Mesters; Ahuva Weiss-Meilnik; Ravit Geva; Guy Rozner; Hana Strul; Moshe Inbar; Zamir Halpern; Revital Kariv
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Motivation-based intervention to promote colonoscopy screening: an integration of a fear management model and motivational interviewing.

Authors:  Watcharaporn Pengchit; Scott T Walters; Rebecca G Simmons; Wendy Kohlmann; Randall W Burt; Marc D Schwartz; Anita Y Kinney
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2011-04-04

7.  Interactions among physicians, patients, and first-degree relatives in the familial screening of colorectal cancer in France.

Authors:  Isabelle Ingrand; Sarah Dujoncquoy; Virginie Migeot; Véronique Ghadi; Michel Beauchant; Pierre Ingrand
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 2.711

8.  Screening patterns in patients with a family history of colorectal cancer often do not adhere to national guidelines.

Authors:  Otto S Lin; Michael Gluck; Matthew Nguyen; Johannes Koch; Richard A Kozarek
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 9.  Understanding the contribution of family history to colorectal cancer risk and its clinical implications: A state-of-the-science review.

Authors:  Jan T Lowery; Dennis J Ahnen; Paul C Schroy; Heather Hampel; Nancy Baxter; C Richard Boland; Randall W Burt; Lynn Butterly; Megan Doerr; Mary Doroshenk; W Gregory Feero; Nora Henrikson; Uri Ladabaum; David Lieberman; Elizabeth G McFarland; Susan K Peterson; Martha Raymond; N Jewel Samadder; Sapna Syngal; Thomas K Weber; Ann G Zauber; Robert Smith
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  A randomized trial of generic versus tailored interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening among intermediate risk siblings.

Authors:  Sharon L Manne; Elliot J Coups; Arnold Markowitz; Neal J Meropol; Daniel Haller; Paul B Jacobsen; Lina Jandorf; Susan K Peterson; Samuel Lesko; Steven Pilipshen; Gary Winkel
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2009-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.