Literature DB >> 17761229

The Diet Quality Index-Revised: a tool to promote and evaluate dietary change among older cancer survivors enrolled in a home-based intervention trial.

Denise Clutter Snyder1, Richard Sloane, Pamela S Haines, Paige Miller, Elizabeth C Clipp, Miriam C Morey, Carl Pieper, Harvey Cohen, Wendy Demark-Wahnefried.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To utilize the Diet Quality Index-Revised (DQI-R) as a framework for delivering and evaluating an intervention to improve overall diet quality among older cancer survivors.
DESIGN: As part of a randomized controlled trial to improve lifestyle behaviors among older cancer survivors, we sought a dietary measure that could serve as both an intervention framework and a means to evaluate global dietary quality. The DQI-R measures overall diet quality by summing 10 subscales that relate to national guidelines. At baseline, DQI-R scores were generated from three multi-pass 24-hour dietary recalls. The 6-month intervention delivered tailored feedback on individual DQI-R subscales. Dietary recalls were repeated at 6 and 12 months.
SUBJECTS: Elderly (aged >or=65 years) individuals within 18 months of diagnosis of breast or prostate cancer (n=182) were randomized postbaseline measures to intervention vs attention control arms.
RESULTS: Significant differences in overall diet quality were observed between arms at 6 months, with the intervention arm improving (67.6+/-12.2 to 69.8+/-13.9), and controls declining (67.5+/-12.5 to 64.6+/-14.7) (P=0.003). Significant differences were observed between arms over time in dietary diversity subscale scores: baseline and 6-month follow-up means among intervention and control arms were 4.8+/-1.3 to 4.8+/-1.4, and 4.7+/-1.2 to 4.1+/-1.1, respectively (P=0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The DQI-R served as an effective guide and evaluation tool for this diet-related randomized controlled trial. Like many interventions, our effect diminished after the intervention was complete. Future research should consider testing interventions that use the DQI-R, or other global diet-related indexes, as guides and evaluation tools over longer study periods, as well as in other populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17761229     DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2007.06.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc        ISSN: 0002-8223


  7 in total

1.  Impact of food aid on food variety and dietary diversity of an elderly community in Sharpeville, South Africa.

Authors:  W H Oldewage Theron; R Kruger
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.075

Review 2.  Physical activity and/or dietary interventions in breast cancer survivors: a systematic review of the maintenance of outcomes.

Authors:  Lauren C Spark; Marina M Reeves; Brianna S Fjeldsoe; Elizabeth G Eakin
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 4.442

3.  The Dutch Healthy Diet index (DHD-index): an instrument to measure adherence to the Dutch Guidelines for a Healthy Diet.

Authors:  Linde van Lee; Anouk Geelen; Eveline J C Hooft van Huysduynen; Jeanne H M de Vries; Pieter van't Veer; Edith J M Feskens
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 3.271

4.  The impact of behavioural screening on intervention outcomes in a randomised, controlled multiple behaviour intervention trial.

Authors:  Lauren A Waters; Elisabeth A Winkler; Marina M Reeves; Brianna S Fjeldsoe; Elizabeth G Eakin
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 6.457

5.  Evaluation for the effects of nutritional education on Chinese elite male young soccer players: The application of adjusted dietary balance index (DBI).

Authors:  Dan Zeng; Zi-Long Fang; Lu Qin; Ai-Qi Yu; Ying-Bin Ren; Bo-Yang Xue; Xin Zhou; Zi-Yu Gao; Meng Ding; Nan An; Qi-Rong Wang
Journal:  J Exerc Sci Fit       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 3.103

6.  The relationship between dietary patterns, dietary quality index, and dietary inflammatory index with the risk of all types of cancer: Golestan cohort study.

Authors:  Marzieh Nojomi; Arash Tehrani Banihashemi; Hassan Niksima; Maryam Hashemian; Azadeh Mottaghi; Reza Malekzaddeh
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2021-04-13

7.  Physical activity screening to recruit inactive randomized controlled trial participants: how much is too much?

Authors:  Corneel Vandelanotte; Robert Stanton; Amanda L Rebar; Anetta K Van Itallie; Cristina M Caperchione; Mitch J Duncan; Trevor N Savage; Richard R Rosenkranz; Gregory S Kolt
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 2.279

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.