Literature DB >> 1775662

A further examination of attentional effects in the phonemic restoration illusion.

A G Samuel1.   

Abstract

Models of how listeners understand speech must specify the types of representations that are computed, the nature of the flow of information, and the control structures that modify performance. Three experiments are reported that focus on the control processes in speech perception. Subjects in the experiments tried to discriminate stimuli in which a phoneme had been replaced with white noise from stimuli in which white noise was merely superimposed on a phoneme. In the first two experiments, subjects practiced the discrimination for thousands of trials but did not improve, suggesting that they have poor access to low-level representations of the speech signal. In the third experiment, each (auditory) stimulus was preceded by a visual cue that could potentially be used to focus attention in order to enhance performance. Only subjects who received information about both the identity of the impending word and the identity of the critical phoneme showed enhanced discrimination. Other cues, including syllabic plus phonemic information, were ineffective. The results indicate that attentional control of processing is difficult but possible, and that lexical representations play a central role in the allocation of attention.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1775662     DOI: 10.1080/14640749108400992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A        ISSN: 0272-4987


  6 in total

1.  Perceptual restoration of a "missing" speech sound: auditory induction or illusion?

Authors:  B H Repp
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-01

2.  Use of speech-modulated noise adds strong "bottom-up" cues for phonemic restoration.

Authors:  J A Bashford; R M Warren; C A Brown
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-04

3.  Phonemic restoration in Alzheimer's disease and semantic dementia: a preliminary investigation.

Authors:  Jessica Jiang; Jeremy C S Johnson; Maï-Carmen Requena-Komuro; Elia Benhamou; Harri Sivasathiaseelan; Damion L Sheppard; Anna Volkmer; Sebastian J Crutch; Chris J D Hardy; Jason D Warren
Journal:  Brain Commun       Date:  2022-05-07

4.  Multisensory integration enhances phonemic restoration.

Authors:  Antoine J Shahin; Lee M Miller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  In Spoken Word Recognition, the Future Predicts the Past.

Authors:  Laura Gwilliams; Tal Linzen; David Poeppel; Alec Marantz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Phonemic restoration in developmental dyslexia.

Authors:  Stephanie N Del Tufo; Emily B Myers
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 4.677

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.