Literature DB >> 1773147

Elective total hip replacement: incidence, emergency readmission rate, and postoperative mortality.

V Seagroatt1, H S Tan, M Goldacre, C Bulstrode, I Nugent, L Gill.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To report the incidence of elective total hip replacement and postoperative mortality, emergency readmission rates, and the demographic factors associated with these rates in a large defined population.
DESIGN: Analysis of linked, routine abstracts of hospital inpatient records and death certificates.
SETTING: 10 hospitals in six districts in Oxford Regional Health Authority covered by the Oxford record linkage study.
SUBJECTS: Records for 11,607 total hip replacements performed electively in 1976-85. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of operation, postoperative mortality, relative mortality ratios, and incidence of emergency readmission.
RESULTS: NHS operation rates increased over time from 43 to 58 operations/100,000 population. Variation in operation rates between districts reduced over time. Operation rates were on average 25% higher in women than men. There were 93 deaths (11/1000 operations) within 90 days of the operation and 208 emergency readmissions (28/1000 operations) within 28 days of discharge. Postoperative mortality and emergency readmission rates increased with age. No significant trend with time was found. Mortality in the 90 days after the operation was 2.5-fold higher (1.9 to 3.0) than in the rest of the first postoperative year. This represented an estimated excess of 6.5 (4.2 to 8.8) early postoperative deaths/1000 operations. Most deaths were ascribed to cardiovascular events. Thromboembolic disease was the commonest reason for emergency readmission.
CONCLUSIONS: The pronounced increase in operations in districts with initially low rates suggests a trend towards greater equity in the local provision of NHS hip arthroplasty. The early postoperative clusters of deaths attributed to cardiovascular disease and of readmissions for thromboembolic disease suggest that there is scope for investigating ways of reducing the incidence of major adverse postoperative events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1773147      PMCID: PMC1671663          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.303.6815.1431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  16 in total

1.  Mobilisation after hip surgery and efficacy of thromboprophylaxis.

Authors:  M R Lassen; L C Borris
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-03-09       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Use of medical record linkage to study readmission rates.

Authors:  J Henderson; M J Goldacre; M J Graveney; H M Simmons
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-09-16

3.  Charnley low-friction arthroplasty. Review of the past, present status, and prospects for the future.

Authors:  B M Wroblewski
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Experience with Charnley low-friction arthroplasty in Japan.

Authors:  K Terayama
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Contribution of the private sector to elective surgery in England and Wales.

Authors:  J P Nicholl; K J Thomas; B T Williams; J Knowelden
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-07-14       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Fracture of femoral prostheses in total hip replacement. A clinical study.

Authors:  J Charnley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  A ten-year follow-up study of 170 Charnley total hip arthroplasties.

Authors:  L P Brady; J W McCutchen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Low-friction arthroplasty of the hip. A 10-12-year follow-up study.

Authors:  J Older
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  15-21-year results of the Charnley low-friction arthroplasty.

Authors:  B M Wroblewski
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Survivorship analysis of total hip replacements. Results in a series of active patients who were less than fifty-five years old.

Authors:  C N Cornell; C S Ranawat
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  30 in total

Review 1.  Preventing thromboembolic complications in older orthopaedic surgery patients: interventions and outcomes.

Authors:  J W Eikelboom; J S Ginsberg
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 2.  International variation in hip replacement rates.

Authors:  H Merx; K Dreinhöfer; P Schräder; T Stürmer; W Puhl; K-P Günther; H Brenner
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  Disability in adults with hip and knee arthroplasty: a French national community based survey.

Authors:  I Boutron; S Poiraudeau; J-F Ravaud; G Baron; M Revel; R Nizard; M Dougados; Ph Ravaud
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  Socioeconomic differences in childhood hospital inpatient service utilisation and costs: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Stavros Petrou; Emil Kupek
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Efficacy and safety of postdischarge administration of enoxaparin in the prevention of deep venous thrombosis after total hip replacement. A prospective randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  A Planes; N Vochelle; J Y Darmon; M Fagola; M Bellaud; D Compan; E Saliba; N Weisslinger; Y Huet
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Incidence of disease after vasectomy: a record linkage retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  H Nienhuis; M Goldacre; V Seagroatt; L Gill; M Vessey
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-03-21

7.  Quality of life and functional ability in hip and knee replacements: a prospective study.

Authors:  P Rissanen; S Aro; H Sintonen; P Slätis; P Paavolainen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Prevalence of total hip replacement: how much demand has been met?

Authors:  M H Williams; J N Newton; S J Frankel; F Braddon; E Barclay; J A Gray
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Readmission rates in the state of Florida: a reflection of quality?

Authors:  Carlos J Lavernia; Jesus M Villa; David A Iacobelli
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Cost-utility analysis of primary prophylaxis versus treatment on-demand for individuals with severe haemophilia.

Authors:  Alexander H Miners; Caroline A Sabin; Keith H Tolley; Christine A Lee
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.