Literature DB >> 17729354

Reproducibility of wall shear stress assessment with the paraboloid method in the internal carotid artery with velocity encoded MRI in healthy young individuals.

Frieke M A Box1, Rob J van der Geest, Jeroen van der Grond, Matthias J P van Osch, Aeilko H Zwinderman, Inge H Palm-Meinders, Joost Doornbos, Gerard-Jan Blauw, Mark A van Buchem, Johan H C Reiber.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To verify whether wall shear stress (WSS) can be assessed in a reproducible manner using automatic model-based segmentation of phase-contrast MR images by determination of flow volume and maximum flow velocity (Vmax) in cross-sections of these vessels.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The approach is based on fitting a 3D paraboloid to the actual velocity profiles and on determining Vmax. WSS was measured in the internal carotid arteries of two groups of healthy young volunteers. The reproducibility of rescanning and repositioning was studied in the first group. In the second group a 1-week and a 1-month interval was investigated. Reproducibility was calculated by the intraclass correlation (ICC).
RESULTS: The flow volume, Vmax, and WSS averaged over the cardiac cycle were found to be 287.8 +/- 29.7 mL/min, 37.0 +/- 4.6 cm/s, and 1.13 +/- 0.16 Pa, respectively. The diastolic WSS varied between 1.00 +/- 0.21 Pa without averaging to 0.88 +/- 0.16 Pa with temporal and spatial averaging. Systolic WSS was 1.67 +/- 0.33 Pa without averaging and 1.67 +/- 0.25 Pa with averaging. ICC varied between 0.58 and 0.87 without averaging and between 0.75 and 0.90 with averaging for WSS.
CONCLUSION: WSS in MR images of the internal carotid artery can be assessed semiautomatically with good to excellent reproducibility without inter- or intraobserver variability using model-based postprocessing. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17729354     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  9 in total

1.  Endothelial shear stress estimation in the human carotid artery based on Womersley versus Poiseuille flow.

Authors:  Janina C V Schwarz; Raphaël Duivenvoorden; Aart J Nederveen; Erik S G Stroes; Ed VanBavel
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Flow characteristics in a canine aneurysm model: a comparison of 4D accelerated phase-contrast MR measurements and computational fluid dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Jingfeng Jiang; Kevin Johnson; Kristian Valen-Sendstad; Kent-Andre Mardal; Oliver Wieben; Charles Strother
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Hemodynamics in a three-dimensional printed aortic model: a comparison of four-dimensional phase-contrast magnetic resonance and image-based computational fluid dynamics.

Authors:  Junghun Kim; Jongmin Lee; Jieun Park; Sinjae Hyun
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 2.533

Review 4.  Magnetic [corrected] resonance imaging [corrected] features of the disruption-prone and the disrupted carotid plaque.

Authors:  Baocheng Chu; Marina S Ferguson; Huijun Chen; Daniel S Hippe; William S Kerwin; Gador Canton; Chun Yuan; Thomas S Hatsukami
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-07

5.  Optimum fuzzy filters for phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging segmentation.

Authors:  Kartik S Sundareswaran; David H Frakes; Mark A Fogel; Dennis D Soerensen; John N Oshinski; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Hemodynamics in Normal Cerebral Arteries: Qualitative Comparison of 4D Phase-Contrast Magnetic Resonance and Image-Based Computational Fluid Dynamics.

Authors:  Juan R Cebral; Christopher M Putman; Marcus T Alley; Thomas Hope; Roland Bammer; Fernando Calamante
Journal:  J Eng Math       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 1.509

7.  MRI evaluation of the relationship between carotid artery endothelial shear stress and brain white matter lesions in migraine.

Authors:  Evelien S Hoogeveen; Enrico B Arkink; Jeroen van der Grond; Mark A van Buchem; Michel D Ferrari; Gisela M Terwindt; Mark C Kruit
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 6.200

8.  An LDV based method to quantify the error of PC-MRI derived Wall Shear Stress measurement.

Authors:  Marco Castagna; Sébastien Levilly; Perrine Paul-Gilloteaux; Saïd Moussaoui; Jean-Marc Rousset; Félicien Bonnefoy; Jérôme Idier; Jean-Michel Serfaty; David Le Touzé
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Exploring the Relationships Between Hemodynamic Stresses in the Carotid Arteries.

Authors:  Magnus Ziegler; Jesper Alfraeus; Elin Good; Jan Engvall; Ebo de Muinck; Petter Dyverfeldt
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-02-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.