PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between ADC values measured by diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) and the split glomerular filtration rate (GFR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: DWI (b = 0 and 500 seconds/mm(2)) was performed with a 1.5 T MR unit in 55 patients. The ADCs were calculated with ROIs positioned in the renal parenchyma, and the split GFRs were measured by (99)Tc(m)-DTPA scintigraphy using Gates' method. The 110 kidneys were divided into four groups: normal renal function (GFR 40 mL x minute(-1)), mild renal impairment (40 > GFR > or = 20 mL x minute(-1)), moderate renal impairment (20 > GFR > or = 10 mL x minute(-1)), and severe renal impairment (GFR < 10 mL x minute(-1)). The renal ADCs between four groups were statistically compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the relationship between ADCs and GFR was examined using Pearson's correlation test. RESULTS: The mean renal ADCs of the four groups were 2.87 +/- 0.11, 2.55 +/- 0.17, 2.29 +/- 0.10, and 2.20 +/- 0.11 x 10(-3)mm(2)/second, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in renal ADCs among the four groups (P < 0.001). There was a positive correlation between the ADCs and split GFR (r = 0.709). CONCLUSION: The ADCs were significantly lower in impaired kidneys than in normal kidneys, and there was a positive correlation between the ADCs and GFR. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between ADC values measured by diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) and the split glomerular filtration rate (GFR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: DWI (b = 0 and 500 seconds/mm(2)) was performed with a 1.5 T MR unit in 55 patients. The ADCs were calculated with ROIs positioned in the renal parenchyma, and the split GFRs were measured by (99)Tc(m)-DTPA scintigraphy using Gates' method. The 110 kidneys were divided into four groups: normal renal function (GFR 40 mL x minute(-1)), mild renal impairment (40 > GFR > or = 20 mL x minute(-1)), moderate renal impairment (20 > GFR > or = 10 mL x minute(-1)), and severe renal impairment (GFR < 10 mL x minute(-1)). The renal ADCs between four groups were statistically compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the relationship between ADCs and GFR was examined using Pearson's correlation test. RESULTS: The mean renal ADCs of the four groups were 2.87 +/- 0.11, 2.55 +/- 0.17, 2.29 +/- 0.10, and 2.20 +/- 0.11 x 10(-3)mm(2)/second, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in renal ADCs among the four groups (P < 0.001). There was a positive correlation between the ADCs and split GFR (r = 0.709). CONCLUSION: The ADCs were significantly lower in impaired kidneys than in normal kidneys, and there was a positive correlation between the ADCs and GFR. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Lorenzo Mannelli; Jeffrey H Maki; Sherif F Osman; Hersh Chandarana; David J Lomas; William P Shuman; Ken F Linnau; Douglas E Green; Giacomo Laffi; Miriam Moshiri Journal: Curr Urol Rep Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 3.092
Authors: Jeff L Zhang; Eric E Sigmund; Hersh Chandarana; Henry Rusinek; Qun Chen; Pierre-Hugues Vivier; Bachir Taouli; Vivian S Lee Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-01-20 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Maria A Bedoya; Jeffrey I Berman; Jorge Delgado; Dmitry Khrichenko; Christian A Barrera; Robert H Carson; Kassa Darge Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2019-04-19
Authors: Jochen Herrmann; Ulrich Wenzel; Stephanie Galler; Bjoern P Schoennagel; Jasmin D Busch; Magdalini Tozakidou; Kay U Petersen; Michaela Joekel; Peter Bannas; Jin Yamamura; Michael Groth; Gerhard Adam; Christian R Habermann Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-05-12 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Shigehiro Doi; Yonglong Zou; Osamu Togao; Johanne V Pastor; George B John; Lei Wang; Kazuhiro Shiizaki; Russell Gotschall; Susan Schiavi; Noriaki Yorioka; Masaya Takahashi; David A Boothman; Makoto Kuro-O Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2011-01-05 Impact factor: 5.157