Literature DB >> 1772915

Application of an artificial neural network in radiographic diagnosis.

D W Piraino1, S C Amartur, B J Richmond, J P Schils, J M Thome, G H Belhobek, M D Schlucter.   

Abstract

The description of 44 cases of bone tumors was used by an artificial neural network to rank the likelihood of 55 possible pathologic diagnoses. The performance of the artificial neural network was compared with the performance of experienced (3 or more years of radiology training) residents and inexperienced (less than 1 year of radiology training) residents. The artificial neural network was trained using descriptions of 110 radiographs of bone tumors with known diagnoses. The descriptions of a separate set of 44 cases were used to test the neural network. The neural network ranked 55 possible pathologic diagnoses on a scale from 1 to 55. Experienced and inexperienced residents also ranked the possible diagnoses in the same 44 cases. Inexperienced residents had a significantly lower mean proportion of diagnoses ranked first or second than did the neural network. Experienced residents had a significantly higher proportion of correct diagnoses ranked first than did the network. Otherwise, a significant difference between the performance of the network and experienced or inexperienced residents was not identified. These results demonstrate that artificial neural networks can be trained to classify bone tumors. Whether neural network performance in classification of bone tumors can be made accurate enough to assist radiologists in clinical practice remains an open question. These preliminary results indicate that further investigation of this technology for interpretation assistance is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1772915     DOI: 10.1007/bf03173904

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  4 in total

1.  Potential usefulness of an artificial neural network for differential diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases: pilot study.

Authors:  N Asada; K Doi; H MacMahon; S M Montner; M L Giger; C Abe; Y Wu
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Expert system-controlled image display.

Authors:  H A Swett; P R Fisher; A I Cohn; P L Miller; P G Mutalik
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Problems in applying expert system technology to radiographic image interpretation.

Authors:  D W Piraino; B J Richmond; M Uetani; T Luetkehaus; D Rockey; G Belhobek; J Armistead; F Jones
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  An overview of medical expert systems.

Authors:  P H de Vries; P F de Vries Robbé
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 2.176

  4 in total
  9 in total

1.  The prospect of expert system-based cognitive support as a by-product of image acquisition and reporting.

Authors:  P G Mutalik; G G Weltin; P R Fisher; H A Swett
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  The power of knowledge in radiologic education and decision making.

Authors:  H A Swett
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Artificial intelligence in musculoskeletal oncological radiology.

Authors:  Matjaz Vogrin; Teodor Trojner; Robi Kelc
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  A feed forward neural network for classification of bull's-eye myocardial perfusion images.

Authors:  D Hamilton; P J Riley; U J Miola; A A Amro
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1995-02

5.  Using an artificial neural network to diagnose hepatic masses.

Authors:  P S Maclin; J Dempsey
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 6.  Artificial intelligence in medicine and male infertility.

Authors:  D J Lamb; C S Niederberger
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  A decision aid for diagnosis of liver lesions on MRI.

Authors:  R Tombropoulos; S Shiffman; C Davidson
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1993

8.  Does Artificial Intelligence Outperform Natural Intelligence in Interpreting Musculoskeletal Radiological Studies? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Olivier Q Groot; Michiel E R Bongers; Paul T Ogink; Joeky T Senders; Aditya V Karhade; Jos A M Bramer; Jorrit-Jan Verlaan; Joseph H Schwab
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 4.755

9.  Artificial intelligence in musculoskeletal oncological radiology.

Authors:  Matjaz Vogrin; Teodor Trojner; Robi Kelc
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 2.991

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.