OBJECTIVE: To provide an evidence-based review of measures of psychosocial adjustment and psychopathology, with a specific focus on their use in the field of pediatric psychology. METHODS: As part of a larger survey of pediatric psychologists from the Society of Pediatric Psychology e-mail listserv (American Psychological Association, APA, Division 54), 37 measures were selected for this psychometric review. Measures that qualified for the review fell into one of the following three categories: (a) internalizing or externalizing rating scales, (b) broad-band rating scales, and (c) self-related rating scales. RESULTS: Psychometric characteristics (i.e., three types of reliability, two types of validity) were strong for the majority of measures reviewed, with 34 of the 37 measures meeting "well-established" evidence-based assessment (EBA) criteria. Strengths and weaknesses of existing measures were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations for future work in this area of assessment are presented, including suggestions that more fine-grained EBA criteria be developed and that evidence-based "profiles" be devised for each measure.
OBJECTIVE: To provide an evidence-based review of measures of psychosocial adjustment and psychopathology, with a specific focus on their use in the field of pediatric psychology. METHODS: As part of a larger survey of pediatric psychologists from the Society of Pediatric Psychology e-mail listserv (American Psychological Association, APA, Division 54), 37 measures were selected for this psychometric review. Measures that qualified for the review fell into one of the following three categories: (a) internalizing or externalizing rating scales, (b) broad-band rating scales, and (c) self-related rating scales. RESULTS: Psychometric characteristics (i.e., three types of reliability, two types of validity) were strong for the majority of measures reviewed, with 34 of the 37 measures meeting "well-established" evidence-based assessment (EBA) criteria. Strengths and weaknesses of existing measures were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations for future work in this area of assessment are presented, including suggestions that more fine-grained EBA criteria be developed and that evidence-based "profiles" be devised for each measure.
Authors: Lindsey L Cohen; Annette M La Greca; Ronald L Blount; Anne E Kazak; Grayson N Holmbeck; Kathleen L Lemanek Journal: J Pediatr Psychol Date: 2006-05-04
Authors: Lisa A Schwartz; Lauren C Daniel; Lauren D Brumley; Lamia P Barakat; Kimberly M Wesley; Lisa K Tuchman Journal: J Pediatr Psychol Date: 2014-06-01
Authors: Jill M Plevinsky; Ana M Gutierrez-Colina; Julia K Carmody; Kevin A Hommel; Lori E Crosby; Meghan E McGrady; Ahna L H Pai; Rachelle R Ramsey; Avani C Modi Journal: J Pediatr Psychol Date: 2020-04-01
Authors: Malin Gren-Landell; Andreas Björklind; Maria Tillfors; Tomas Furmark; Carl Göran Svedin; Gerhard Andersson Journal: Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health Date: 2009-11-11 Impact factor: 3.033