Literature DB >> 17726081

Effects of atorvastatin on bone in postmenopausal women with dyslipidemia: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging trial.

Henry G Bone1, Douglas P Kiel, Robert S Lindsay, E Michael Lewiecki, Michael A Bolognese, Elizabeth T Leary, Wing Lowe, Michael R McClung.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: In preclinical models, inhibitors of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase have been shown to positively affect bone remodeling balance. Observational studies and secondary analyses from lipid-lowering trials have yielded inconsistent results regarding the effect of these agents on bone mineral density and fracture risk.
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine whether clinically significant skeletal benefits result from hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibition in postmenopausal women. DESIGN AND
SETTING: We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging comparative clinical trial at 62 sites in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Participants included 626 postmenopausal women with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels of at least 130 mg/dl (3.4 mmol/liter) and less than 190 mg/dl (4.9 mmol/liter), and lumbar (L1-L4) spine bone mineral density T-score between 0.0 and -2.5. INTERVENTION: Once-daily placebo or 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg atorvastatin was administered. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We assessed percent change from baseline in lumbar (L1-L4) spine bone mineral density with each dose of atorvastatin compared with placebo.
RESULTS: At 52 wk, there was no significant difference between each atorvastatin and placebo group or change from baseline at any tested dose of atorvastatin or placebo in lumbar (L1-L4) spine bone mineral density. Nor did atorvastatin produce a significant change in bone mineral density at any other site. Changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover did not differ significantly between each atorvastatin and placebo group. All doses of atorvastatin were generally well tolerated, with similar incidences of adverse events across all dose groups and placebo.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinically relevant doses of atorvastatin that lower lipid levels had no effect on bone mineral density or biochemical indices of bone metabolism in this study, suggesting that such oral agents are not useful in the prevention or treatment of osteoporosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17726081     DOI: 10.1210/jc.2006-1909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  20 in total

1.  [Changes in bone mass with atorvastatin. BM AND AT study].

Authors:  Mariano Blasco Valle; José María Ferreras Amez; Ángel Vicente Molinero; Víctor Abadía Gallego; Marco Sarrat Torres
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 1.137

Review 2.  Efficacy of statins for primary prevention in people at low cardiovascular risk: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marcello Tonelli; Anita Lloyd; Fiona Clement; Jon Conly; Don Husereau; Brenda Hemmelgarn; Scott Klarenbach; Finlay A McAlister; Natasha Wiebe; Braden Manns
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  The Safety and Tolerability of Statin Therapy in Primary Prevention in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhen Zhou; Loai Albarqouni; Andrea J Curtis; Monique Breslin; Mark Nelson
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 4.  Safety Profile of Atorvastatin 80 mg: A Meta-Analysis of 17 Randomized Controlled Trials in 21,910 Participants.

Authors:  Haixia Li; Cailian Wang; Shuo Zhang; Sihao Sun; Ruifei Li; Meijuan Zou; Gang Cheng
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  Should we abandon statins in the prevention of bone fractures?

Authors:  Katherine Esposito; Annalisa Capuano; Liberata Sportiello; Andrea Giustina; Dario Giugliano
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2013-03-24       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 6.  Statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Fiona Taylor; Mark D Huffman; Ana Filipa Macedo; Theresa H M Moore; Margaret Burke; George Davey Smith; Kirsten Ward; Shah Ebrahim
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-01-31

7.  Comparative impact of systemic delivery of atorvastatin, simvastatin, and lovastatin on bone mineral density of the ovariectomized rats.

Authors:  Mostafa Shahrezaee; Ahmad Oryan; Farshid Bastami; Sepanta Hosseinpour; Mohammad Hossein Shahrezaee; Amir Kamali
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 3.633

8.  Biochemical markers of bone turnover: potential use in the investigation and management of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  P Szulc; P D Delmas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Significant reduction in the LDL cholesterol increases the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 33 randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Yao Cheng; Longwei Qiao; Zhibiao Jiang; Xiaofeng Dong; Hongxuan Feng; Qian Gui; Yaojuan Lu; Yuting Liang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 4.060

10.  Simvastatin does not affect vitamin d status, but low vitamin d levels are associated with dyslipidemia: results from a randomised, controlled trial.

Authors:  Lars Rejnmark; Peter Vestergaard; Lene Heickendorff; Leif Mosekilde
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 3.257

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.