| Literature DB >> 17725760 |
Fadi Mansour1, Bernard Thibault, Marc Dubuc, Peter G Guerra, Laurent Macle, Ramon Brugada, Denis Roy, Mario Talajic, Paul Khairy.
Abstract
A 36 year-old man with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and an ATLAS + DR implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) (St. Jude Medical, Inc., St. Paul, MN, USA) for primary prevention received a shock while cycling. The ventricular fibrillation detection threshold was 182 beats/min. An additional monitoring zone was programmed to 156 beats/min with all discriminators "on" except morphology. On interrogation, the ICD shock followed sinus tachycardia. In the absence of a monitoring zone, device therapy would not have been expected. We explore the mechanisms by which monitoring zones could potentially contribute to inappropriate ICD therapy and offer trouble-shooting tips.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17725760 DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00827.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ISSN: 0147-8389 Impact factor: 1.976