Literature DB >> 17725760

Shocking truths about implantable cardioverter defibrillator monitoring zones.

Fadi Mansour1, Bernard Thibault, Marc Dubuc, Peter G Guerra, Laurent Macle, Ramon Brugada, Denis Roy, Mario Talajic, Paul Khairy.   

Abstract

A 36 year-old man with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and an ATLAS + DR implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) (St. Jude Medical, Inc., St. Paul, MN, USA) for primary prevention received a shock while cycling. The ventricular fibrillation detection threshold was 182 beats/min. An additional monitoring zone was programmed to 156 beats/min with all discriminators "on" except morphology. On interrogation, the ICD shock followed sinus tachycardia. In the absence of a monitoring zone, device therapy would not have been expected. We explore the mechanisms by which monitoring zones could potentially contribute to inappropriate ICD therapy and offer trouble-shooting tips.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17725760     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00827.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  3 in total

1.  Prevention of inappropriate ICD shocks in patients with Brugada syndrome.

Authors:  Christian Veltmann; Juergen Kuschyk; Rainer Schimpf; Florian Streitner; Nina Schoene; Martin Borggrefe; Christian Wolpert
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 2.  A review of the confirmation algorithm and related timing cycles of St. Jude ICDs.

Authors:  S Serge Barold; Roland X Stroobandt
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2013-08-09

3.  An inappropriate shock after reprogramming tachycardia zones.

Authors:  Rita Marinheiro; Leonor Parreira; Pedro Amador; Dinis Mesquita; Lurdes Almeida; Ana Lousinha; José Farinha; Marta Fonseca; Ana Fátima Esteves; Rui Caria
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2019-06-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.