Literature DB >> 17724717

Misclassification of colorectal cancer stage and area variation in survival.

Xue Q Yu1, Dianne L O'Connell, Robert W Gibberd, Michal Abrahamowicz, Bruce K Armstrong.   

Abstract

We previously investigated the impact of health area of residence on colon and rectal cancer survival by estimating area-specific relative excess risk of death (RER), stratified by stage at diagnosis. The aims of this study were to quantify errors in colorectal cancer stage obtained from an Australian population-based cancer registry and assess the potential impact of errors in stage on these estimates. For a subset of cases, we compared the cancer registry stage with that from a survey of treating surgeons. We then randomly reallocated all cases to a simulated "corrected" stage according to the estimated misclassification probabilities and repeated the analysis of area variation stratified by simulated stage 1,000 times. We found 70% agreement between the Registry and Survey stage. This reallocation of the Registry cases by stage resulted in substantial variation in area-specific RERs across the simulated samples. Area variation in survival for localized colon and localized rectal cancer, which were previously statistically significant when classified using Registry stage, appeared no longer to be so. Misclassification of cancer registry stage can have an important impact on estimates of spatial variation in stage-specific colon and rectal cancer survival. If population-based cancer registry data are to be effectively used in evaluating and improving cancer care, the quality of the stage data may need to be improved. Copyright 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17724717     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.23043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  7 in total

1.  Baseline mortality-adjusted survival in resected rectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Ignazio Tarantino; Sascha A Müller; Rene Warschkow; Yakup Kulu; Bruno M Schmied; Markus W Büchler; Alexis Ulrich
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  A multilevel study of the determinants of area-level inequalities in colorectal cancer survival.

Authors:  Peter D Baade; Gavin Turrell; Joanne F Aitken
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  Using administrative health data to describe colorectal and lung cancer care in New South Wales, Australia: a validation study.

Authors:  David E Goldsbury; Katie Armstrong; Leonardo Simonella; Bruce K Armstrong; Dianne L O'Connell
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Geographic remoteness and risk of advanced colorectal cancer at diagnosis in Queensland: a multilevel study.

Authors:  P D Baade; P Dasgupta; J Aitken; G Turrell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Using linked routinely collected health data to describe prostate cancer treatment in New South Wales, Australia: a validation study.

Authors:  David E Goldsbury; David P Smith; Bruce K Armstrong; Dianne L O'Connell
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Colon and rectal cancer incidence and water trihalomethane concentrations in New South Wales, Australia.

Authors:  Md Bayzidur Rahman; Christine Cowie; Tim Driscoll; Richard J Summerhayes; Bruce K Armstrong; Mark S Clements
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Cancer survival in New South Wales, Australia: socioeconomic disparities remain despite overall improvements.

Authors:  Julia F Stanbury; Peter D Baade; Yan Yu; Xue Qin Yu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 4.430

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.