Literature DB >> 17722086

The impact of drying method and formulation on the physical properties and stability of methionyl human growth hormone in the amorphous solid state.

Ahmad M Abdul-Fattah1, David Lechuga-Ballesteros, Devendra S Kalonia, Michael J Pikal.   

Abstract

The objective of this work was to investigate the impact of drying method and formulation on the physical stability (aggregation) and selected important physical properties of dried methionyl human growth hormone (Met-hGH) formulations. Solutions of Met-hGH with different stabilizers were dried by different methods (freeze drying, spray drying, and film drying), with and without surfactant. Properties of the dried powders included powder morphology, specific surface area (SSA), protein surface coverage, thermal analysis, and protein secondary structure. Storage stability of Met-hGH in different formulations was also studied at 50 degrees C and at 60 degrees C for 3 months. The dried powders displayed different morphologies, depending mainly on the method of drying and on the presence or absence of surfactant. Film dried powders had the lowest SSA (approximately 0.03 m(2)/g) and the lowest total protein surface accumulation (approximately 0.003%). Surfactant caused a reduction in the SSA of both spray dried and freeze dried powders. Spray dried powders showed greater protein surface coverage and SSA relative to the same formulations dried by other means. Greater in-process perturbations of protein secondary structure were observed with polymer excipients. Formulation impacted physical stability. In general, low molecular weight stabilizers provided better stability. For example, the aggregation rate at 50 degrees C of Met-hGH in a freeze dried trehalose-based formulation was approximately four times smaller than the corresponding Ficoll-70-based formulation. Drying method also influenced physical stability. In general, the film dried preparations studied showed superior stability to preparations dried by other methods, especially those formulations employing low molecular weight stabilizers. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17722086     DOI: 10.1002/jps.21085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharm Sci        ISSN: 0022-3549            Impact factor:   3.534


  8 in total

1.  Storage stability of keratinocyte growth factor-2 in lyophilized formulations: effects of formulation physical properties and protein fraction at the solid-air interface.

Authors:  Dilip Devineni; Christoph Gonschorek; Marcus T Cicerone; Yemin Xu; John F Carpenter; Theodore W Randolph
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Biopharm       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 5.571

2.  Effects of moisture content on the storage stability of dried lipoplex formulations.

Authors:  Jinxiang Yu; Thomas J Anchordoquy
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.534

Review 3.  Stability of protein pharmaceuticals: an update.

Authors:  Mark Cornell Manning; Danny K Chou; Brian M Murphy; Robert W Payne; Derrick S Katayama
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 4.  Advanced protein formulations.

Authors:  Wei Wang
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Effect of protective agents on the storage stability of freeze-dried Ligilactobacillus salivarius CECT5713.

Authors:  Maria Guerrero Sanchez; Stéphanie Passot; Sonia Campoy; Monica Olivares; Fernanda Fonseca
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 5.560

Review 6.  Effects of glycosylation on the stability of protein pharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Ricardo J Solá; Kai Griebenow
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.534

7.  Nanostructured thin film polymer devices for constant-rate protein delivery.

Authors:  Daniel A Bernards; Kevin D Lance; Natalie A Ciaccio; Tejal A Desai
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 11.189

8.  Protein quantity on the air-solid interface determines degradation rates of human growth hormone in lyophilized samples.

Authors:  Yemin Xu; Pawel Grobelny; Alexander Von Allmen; Korben Knudson; Michael Pikal; John F Carpenter; Theodore W Randolph
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 3.534

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.