Literature DB >> 17720978

Seedling growth strategies in Bauhinia species: comparing lianas and trees.

Zhi-Quan Cai1, Lourens Poorter, Kun-Fang Cao, Frans Bongers.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Lianas are expected to differ from trees in their growth strategies. As a result these two groups of woody species will have different spatial distributions: lianas are more common in high light environments. This study determines the differences in growth patterns, biomass allocation and leaf traits in five closely related liana and tree species of the genus Bauhinia.
METHODS: Seedlings of two light-demanding lianas (Bauhinia tenuiflora and B. claviflora), one shade-tolerant liana (B. aurea), and two light-demanding trees (B. purpurea and B. monandra) were grown in a shadehouse at 25% of full sunlight. A range of physiological, morphological and biomass parameters at the leaf and whole plant level were compared among these five species. KEY
RESULTS: The two light-demanding liana species had higher relative growth rate (RGR), allocated more biomass to leaf production [higher leaf mass fraction (LMF) and higher leaf area ratio (LAR)] and stem mass fraction (SMF), and less biomass to the roots [root mass fraction (RMF)] than the two tree species. The shade-tolerant liana had the lowest RGR of all five species, and had a higher RMF, lower SMF and similar LMF than the two light-demanding liana species. The two light-demanding lianas had lower photosynthetic rates per unit area (A(area)) and similar photosynthetic rates per unit mass (A(mass)) than the trees. Across species, RGR was positively related to SLA, but not to LAR and A(area).
CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that the faster growth of light-demanding lianas compared with light-demanding trees is based on morphological parameters (SLA, LMF and LAR), and cannot be attributed to higher photosynthetic rates at the leaf level. The shade-tolerant liana exhibited a slow-growth strategy, compared with the light-demanding species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17720978      PMCID: PMC2749636          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcm179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  12 in total

1.  A mechanistic explanation for global patterns of liana abundance and distribution.

Authors:  Stefan A Schnitzer
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2005-05-16       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Life history trade-offs in tropical trees and lianas.

Authors:  Benjamin Gilbert; S Joseph Wright; Helene C Muller-Landau; Kaoru Kitajima; Andrés Hernandéz
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.499

3.  Above-ground biomass investments and light interception of tropical forest trees and lianas early in succession.

Authors:  N G Selaya; N P R Anten; R J Oomen; M Matthies; M J A Werger
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Leaf traits are good predictors of plant performance across 53 rain forest species.

Authors:  Lourens Poorter; Frans Bongers
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.499

5.  Photosynthesis and nitrogen relationships in leaves of C3 plants.

Authors:  John R Evans
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Leaf area ratio and net assimilation rate of 24 wild species differing in relative growth rate.

Authors:  Hendrik Poorter; Carlo Remkes
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Partitioning of water resources among plants of a lowland tropical forest.

Authors:  P C Jackson; J Cavelier; G Goldstein; F C Meinzer; N M Holbrook
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Interspecific and intraspecific variation in tree seedling survival: effects of allocation to roots versus carbohydrate reserves.

Authors:  Charles D Canham; Richard K Kobe; Erika F Latty; Robin L Chazdon
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Variation in foliar δ13C in Hawaiian Metrosideros polymorpha: a case of internal resistance?

Authors:  Peter M Vitousek; Christopher B Field; Pamela A Matson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Field water relations of three temperate vines.

Authors:  D J Bell; I N Forseth; A H Teramura
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  7 in total

1.  Root and leaf traits reflect distinct resource acquisition strategies in tropical lianas and trees.

Authors:  Courtney G Collins; S Joseph Wright; Nina Wurzburger
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-08-09       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Climbing plants in a temperate rainforest understorey: searching for high light or coping with deep shade?

Authors:  Fernando Valladares; Ernesto Gianoli; Alfredo Saldaña
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Are lianas more drought-tolerant than trees? A test for the role of hydraulic architecture and other stem and leaf traits.

Authors:  Masha T van der Sande; Lourens Poorter; Stefan A Schnitzer; Lars Markesteijn
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Biomass and nitrogen distribution ratios reveal a reduced root investment in temperate lianas vs. self-supporting plants.

Authors:  Tomasz P Wyka; Marcin Zadworny; Joanna Mucha; Roma Żytkowiak; Kinga Nowak; Jacek Oleksyn
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Ecophysiological traits may explain the abundance of climbing plant species across the light gradient in a temperate rainforest.

Authors:  Ernesto Gianoli; Alfredo Saldaña; Mylthon Jiménez-Castillo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Growth evaluation of several types of energy crops from tropical shrubs species.

Authors:  Dwi Susanto; Auliana Auliana; Rudianto Amirta
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-03-25

Review 7.  Phenotypic correlates of the lianescent growth form: a review.

Authors:  Tomasz P Wyka; Jacek Oleksyn; Piotr Karolewski; Stefan A Schnitzer
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 4.357

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.