Literature DB >> 16761606

Life history trade-offs in tropical trees and lianas.

Benjamin Gilbert1, S Joseph Wright, Helene C Muller-Landau, Kaoru Kitajima, Andrés Hernandéz.   

Abstract

It has been hypothesized that tropical trees partition forest light environments through a life history trade-off between juvenile growth and survival; however, the generality of this trade-off across life stages and functional groups has been questioned. We quantified trade-offs between growth and survival for trees and lianas on Barro Colorado Island (BCI), Panama using first-year seedlings of 22 liana and 31 tree species and saplings (10 mm < dbh < 39 mm) of 30 tree species. Lianas showed trade-offs similar to those of trees, with both groups exhibiting broadly overlapping ranges in survival and relative growth rates as seedlings. Life history strategies at the seedling stage were highly correlated with those at the sapling stage among tree species, with all species showing an increase in survival with size. Only one of 30 tree species demonstrated a statistically significant ontogenetic shift, having a relatively lower survival rate at the sapling stage than expected. Our results indicate that similar life history trade-offs apply across two functional groups (lianas and trees), and that life history strategies are largely conserved across seedling and sapling life-stages for most tropical tree species.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16761606     DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1281:lhtitt]2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  26 in total

1.  Trade-offs between seedling growth and survival in deciduous broadleaved trees in a temperate forest.

Authors:  Kenji Seiwa
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Seedling growth strategies in Bauhinia species: comparing lianas and trees.

Authors:  Zhi-Quan Cai; Lourens Poorter; Kun-Fang Cao; Frans Bongers
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Understanding height-structured competition in forests: is there an R* for light?

Authors:  Thomas P Adams; Drew W Purves; Stephen W Pacala
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Climbing plants in a temperate rainforest understorey: searching for high light or coping with deep shade?

Authors:  Fernando Valladares; Ernesto Gianoli; Alfredo Saldaña
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Contrasting cost-benefit strategy between lianas and trees in a tropical seasonal rain forest in southwestern China.

Authors:  Shi-Dan Zhu; Kun-Fang Cao
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  A phosphorus threshold for mycoheterotrophic plants in tropical forests.

Authors:  Merlin Sheldrake; Nicholas P Rosenstock; Daniel Revillini; Pål Axel Olsson; S Joseph Wright; Benjamin L Turner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Soil-related variations in the population dynamics of six dipterocarp tree species with strong habitat preferences.

Authors:  Toshihiro Yamada; Yuko Yamada; Toshinori Okuda; Christine Fletcher
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-11-25       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Are lianas more drought-tolerant than trees? A test for the role of hydraulic architecture and other stem and leaf traits.

Authors:  Masha T van der Sande; Lourens Poorter; Stefan A Schnitzer; Lars Markesteijn
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Light requirements of Australian tropical vs. cool-temperate rainforest tree species show different relationships with seedling growth and functional traits.

Authors:  Christopher H Lusk; Jeff W G Kelly; Sean M Gleason
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 4.357

10.  Leaf life span spectrum of tropical woody seedlings: effects of light and ontogeny and consequences for survival.

Authors:  Kaoru Kitajima; Roberto A Cordero; S Joseph Wright
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 4.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.