Literature DB >> 17719642

Comparison of parameters from Heidelberg Retina Tomographs 2 and 3.

Michelle L Gabriele1, Gadi Wollstein, Richard A Bilonick, Zvia Burgansky-Eliash, Hiroshi Ishikawa, Larry E Kagemann, Joel S Schuman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare stereometric parameters and classification results from the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph version 2 (HRT2); HRT3; and HRT3 Glaucoma Probability Score (GPS), an automated method of obtaining optic nerve head analysis without the need for manual definition of disc margin.
DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Five hundred four eyes from 281 consecutive subjects (glaucoma, glaucoma suspect, and healthy) evaluated in a glaucoma clinic.
METHODS: All participants had HRT2 scanning of the optic nerve head. Inclusion criteria were scans with good centration and focus, even illumination, an overall quality score by HRT3 of acceptable or better, and standard deviation < 50 mum. A Bland-Altman analysis was used for the comparison of HRT2 and HRT3. From these results, calibration equations were determined to permit conversion of the measurements between devices. The agreement between HRT2 and HRT3 Moorfields regression analysis (MRA) and HRT3 GPS classification methods was measured using kappa statistics. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Heidelberg Retina Tomograph version 2 and HRT3 stereometric parameters, MRA, and global GPS.
RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference between HRT2 and HRT3 global disc area, rim area, cup area, rim volume, cup volume, height variation contour, and retinal nerve fiber layer cross-sectional area stereometric parameters. All of those parameters were smaller using HRT3, due to a manufacturer-reported horizontal scaling error of 4% in HRT2 that was corrected in HRT3. kappas for agreement were 0.60 between classifications (within normal limits, borderline, and outside normal limits) of MRA by HRT2 and HRT3 and 0.47 between HRT3 MRA and GPS.
CONCLUSIONS: The HRT3 generally provided smaller stereometric disc measurements than HRT2. There was no clear conversion between HRT3 and GPS parameters, as the 2 methods for measuring the stereometric parameters differ.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17719642      PMCID: PMC2907248          DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.05.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  9 in total

1.  Quantitative estimation of retinal nerve fiber layer height in glaucoma and the relationship with optic nerve head topography and visual field.

Authors:  T M Eid; G L Spaeth; L J Katz; A Azuara-Blanco; J Agusburger; J Nicholl
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Correlation between the visual field indices and Heidelberg retina tomograph parameters.

Authors:  M Iester; F S Mikelberg; P Courtright; S M Drance
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Glaucoma detection with the Heidelberg retina tomograph 3.

Authors:  Zvia Burgansky-Eliash; Gadi Wollstein; Richard A Bilonick; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Larry Kagemann; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Optic disc and visual field changes in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with glaucoma: comparison of scanning laser tomography with conventional perimetry and optic disc photography.

Authors:  B C Chauhan; T A McCormick; M T Nicolela; R P LeBlanc
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-10

6.  Inter- and intraobserver variation in the analysis of optic disc images: comparison of the Heidelberg retina tomograph and computer assisted planimetry.

Authors:  D F Garway-Heath; D Poinoosawmy; G Wollstein; A Viswanathan; D Kamal; L Fontana; R A Hitchings
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Automated analysis of normal and glaucomatous optic nerve head topography images.

Authors:  N V Swindale; G Stjepanovic; A Chin; F S Mikelberg
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in the evaluation of optic disc stereometric parameters by Heidelberg Retina Tomograph.

Authors:  Stefano Miglior; Elena Albé; Magda Guareschi; Luca Rossetti; Nicola Orzalesi
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Identification of early glaucoma cases with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope.

Authors:  G Wollstein; D F Garway-Heath; R A Hitchings
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 12.079

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Scan quality effect on glaucoma discrimination by glaucoma imaging devices.

Authors:  K R Sung; G Wollstein; J S Schuman; R A Bilonick; H Ishikawa; K A Townsend; L Kagemann; M L Gabriele
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Relationship between pattern electroretinogram, standard automated perimetry, and optic nerve structural assessments.

Authors:  Mitra Sehi; Mariana Pinzon-Plazas; William J Feuer; David S Greenfield
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2009 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Comparison of the diagnostic ability of Moorfield's regression analysis and glaucoma probability score using Heidelberg retinal tomograph III in eyes with primary open angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Shveta Jindal; Tanuj Dada; V Sreenivas; Viney Gupta; Ramanjit Sihota; Anita Panda
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.848

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.