Literature DB >> 17717738

Preimplantation sex selection demand and preferences among infertility patients in Midwestern United States.

Stacey A Missmer1, Tarun Jain.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the demand and preferences of infertility patients for sex selection for nonmedical reasons, and to investigate the relation between these choices and their demographic and socioeconomic characteristics.
METHODS: A cross-sectional, self-administered survey by mail was conducted at a University hospital-based fertility center of 1,350 consecutive women who presented for infertility care, to assess patient demand and preferences for sex selection.
RESULTS: Of respondents, 49% wanted to select the sex of their next child for no added cost. Of these patients, 56% had no living children and 37% had children all of one sex. After adjustment for observed predictors of gender preference, we found a significant preference for a female child among women who had only sons, had more living children, or were single. Nulliparous women did not significantly prefer one sex over the other. Among parous women, those with only daughters significantly desired to select a male child, whereas those with sons significantly desired to select a female child.
CONCLUSION: There is significant demand among infertility patients for preimplantation sex selection, with a significant portion of this demand coming from patients who do not have any children or have children all of one sex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17717738      PMCID: PMC3455079          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-007-9157-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  20 in total

1.  Sex preselection: an aid to couples or a threat to humanity?

Authors:  G Benagiano; P Bianchi
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  ESHRE Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis Consortium: data collection III (May 2001).

Authors: 
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 3.  Preconception gender selection for nonmedical reasons.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Sex selection for gender variety by preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  John A Robertson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Assisted reproductive practice: religious perspectives.

Authors:  Joscph G Schenker
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.828

6.  Births of normal daughters after MicroSort sperm separation and intrauterine insemination, in-vitro fertilization, or intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  E F Fugger; S H Black; K Keyvanfar; J D Schulman
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  The 50 million missing women.

Authors:  Gautam N Allahbadia
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 8.  Gender selection: cultural and religious perspectives.

Authors:  Joseph G Schenker
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Preconception sex selection demand and preferences in the United States.

Authors:  Edgar Dahl; Ruchi S Gupta; Manfred Beutel; Yve Stoebel-Richter; Burkhard Brosig; Hans-Rudolf Tinneberg; Tarun Jain
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Sex selection in China sees 117 boys born for every 100 girls.

Authors:  Ted Plafker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-05-25
View more
  5 in total

1.  Recalled Parental Gender Preference in Chinese Culture: A Taiwan Birth Cohort Study.

Authors:  For-Wey Lung; Bih-Ching Shu; Tung-Liang Chiang; Shio-Jean Lin
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-02-16

2.  Perceptions towards sex selection among Jordanian population: A survey study.

Authors:  Saleem Ali Banihani; Karem H Alzoubi; Mohammad S Shawaqfeh; Senthilvel Vasudevan
Journal:  Andrologia       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 2.532

3.  The Israeli National Committee for sex selection by pre-implantation genetic diagnosis: a novel approach (2005-2011).

Authors:  Nirit Pessach; Saralee Glasser; Varda Soskolne; Amihai Barash; Liat Lerner-Geva
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2014-10-28

4.  The effect of religious background on the attitude towards sex selection.

Authors:  Anastasia A Salame; Jospeh Nassif; Ghina S Ghazeeri; Elie M Moubarak; Antoine Hannoun; Antoine A Abu Musa
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X       Date:  2019-05-17

5.  Disparities among infertility patients regarding genetic carrier screening, sex selection, and gene editing.

Authors:  Dana B McQueen; Christopher M Warren; Alexander H Xiao; Lee P Shulman; Tarun Jain
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 3.357

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.