Literature DB >> 17717655

Effects of a secondary task on obstacle avoidance in healthy young adults.

Ka-Chun Siu1, Robert D Catena, Li-Shan Chou, Paul van Donkelaar, Marjorie H Woollacott.   

Abstract

Research on attention and gait stability has suggested that the process of recovering gait stability requires attentional resources, but the effect of performing a secondary task on stability during obstacle avoidance is poorly understood. Using a dual-task paradigm, the present experiment investigated the extent to which young adults are able to respond to a secondary auditory Stroop task (requiring executive attentional network resources) concurrently with obstacle crossing during gait when compared with performing unobstructed walking or sitting (control task). Our results demonstrated that as the level of difficulty in the postural task increased, there was a significant reduction in verbal response time from congruent to incongruent conditions in the auditory Stroop task, but no differences in gait parameters, indicating that these postural tasks require attention, and that young adults use a strategy of modulating the auditory Stroop task performance while keeping stable gait performance under the dual-task situations. Our findings suggest the existence of a hierarchy of control within both postural task (obstacle avoidance requires the most information processing resources) and dual-task (with gait stability being a priority) conditions.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17717655      PMCID: PMC2556305          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-1087-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  15 in total

1.  The interacting effects of cognitive demand and recovery of postural stability in balance-impaired elderly persons.

Authors:  S G Brauer; M Woollacott; A Shumway-Cook
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.053

2.  Age-related reduction in sagittal plane center of mass motion during obstacle crossing.

Authors:  Michael E Hahn; Li-Shan Chou
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Attentional demands of postural control: the ability to selectively allocate information-processing resources.

Authors:  Ka-Chun Siu; Marjorie H Woollacott
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  Attentional demands for static and dynamic equilibrium.

Authors:  Y Lajoie; N Teasdale; C Bard; M Fleury
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Effects of age and available response time on ability to step over an obstacle.

Authors:  H C Chen; J A Ashton-Miller; N B Alexander; A B Schultz
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1994-09

Review 6.  Attention: the mechanisms of consciousness.

Authors:  M I Posner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-08-02       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Tests of the automaticity of reading: dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli.

Authors:  D Kahneman; D Chajczyk
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  The allocation of attention during locomotion is altered by anxiety.

Authors:  William H Gage; Ryan J Sleik; Melody A Polych; Nicole C McKenzie; Lesley A Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-18       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Age-dependent differences in the attentional demands of obstacle negotiation.

Authors:  Lesley A Brown; Nicole C McKenzie; Jon B Doan
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 6.053

10.  Stride-to-stride variability while backward counting among healthy young adults.

Authors:  Olivier Beauchet; Véronique Dubost; François R Herrmann; Reto W Kressig
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2005-08-11       Impact factor: 4.262

View more
  29 in total

1.  Effects of dual tasking on the postural performance of people with and without multiple sclerosis: a pilot study.

Authors:  Jesse V Jacobs; Susan L Kasser
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Dual-task performance during a climbing traverse.

Authors:  Alexander L Green; William S Helton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Stiffness control of balance during quiet standing and dual task in older adults: the MOBILIZE Boston Study.

Authors:  Hyun Gu Kang; Lewis A Lipsitz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Stability control during the performance of a simultaneous obstacle avoidance and auditory Stroop task.

Authors:  Timothy A Worden; Lori Ann Vallis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Dual-task performance in older adults during discrete gait perturbation.

Authors:  Joseph O Nnodim; Hogene Kim; James A Ashton-Miller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Relationship Between Dual-Task Gait Speed and Walking Activity Poststroke.

Authors:  Jody A Feld; Lisa A Zukowski; Annie G Howard; Carol A Giuliani; Lori J P Altmann; Bijan Najafi; Prudence Plummer
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Distracting visuospatial attention while approaching an obstacle reduces the toe-obstacle clearance.

Authors:  On-Yee Lo; Paul van Donkelaar; Li-Shan Chou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Attentional artifacts in sensorimotor coupling in the postural control of young adults.

Authors:  Giovanna Gracioli Genoves; Ana Maria Forti Barela; Caroline Sanches; José Angelo Barela
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The influence of carrying an anterior load on attention demand and obstacle clearance before, during, and after obstacle crossing.

Authors:  Deborah A Jehu; Deanna Saunders; Natalie Richer; Nicole Paquet; Yves Lajoie
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Do perturbation-evoked responses result in higher reaction time costs depending on the direction and magnitude of perturbation?

Authors:  Keaton A Inkol; Andrew H Huntley; Lori Ann Vallis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.