Literature DB >> 17717331

Assessment of aortoiliac and renal arteries: MR angiography with parallel acquisition versus conventional MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography.

Reto Sutter1, Daniel Nanz, Amelie M Lutz, Thomas Pfammatter, Burkhardt Seifert, Anja Struwe, Christina Heilmaier, Dominik Weishaupt, Borut Marincek, Jürgen K Willmann.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare the image quality, sensitivity, and specificity of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography accelerated by parallel acquisition (ie, fast MR angiography) with MR angiography not accelerated by parallel acquisition (ie, conventional MR angiography) for assessment of aortoiliac and renal arteries, with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the reference standard.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the institutional review board; informed consent was obtained from all patients. Forty consecutive patients (33 men, seven women; mean age, 63 years) suspected of having aortoiliac and renal arterial stenoses and thus examined with DSA underwent both fast (mean imaging time, 17 seconds) and conventional (mean imaging time, 29 seconds) MR angiography. The arterial tree was divided into segments for image analysis. Two readers independently evaluated all MR angiograms for image quality, presence of arterial stenosis, and renal arterial variants. Image quality, sensitivity, and specificity were analyzed on per-patient and per-segment bases for multiple comparisons (with Bonferroni correction) and for dependencies between segments (with patient as the primary sample unit). Interobserver agreement was evaluated by using kappa statistics.
RESULTS: Overall, the image quality with fast MR angiography was significantly better (P=.001) than that with conventional MR angiography. At per-segment analysis, the image quality of fast MR angiograms of the distal renal artery tended to be better than that of conventional MR angiograms of these vessels. Differences in sensitivity for the detection of arterial stenosis between the two MR angiography techniques were not significant for either reader. Interobserver agreement in the detection of variant renal artery anatomy was excellent with both conventional and fast MR angiography (kappa=1.00).
CONCLUSION: Fast MR angiography and conventional MR angiography do not differ significantly in terms of arterial stenosis grading or renal arterial variant detection. Copyright (c) RSNA, 2007.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17717331     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2451062081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  3 in total

1.  MR angiography with parallel acquisition for assessment of the visceral arteries: comparison with conventional MR angiography and 64-detector-row computed tomography.

Authors:  Reto Sutter; Christina Heilmaier; Amelie M Lutz; Dominik Weishaupt; Burkhardt Seifert; Jürgen K Willmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-06-13       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Time resolved DCE-MRI of the kidneys: Evaluation of the renal vasculatures and tumors using F-DISCO with and without compressed sensing in normal and wide-bore 3T systems.

Authors:  Takahiro Yamada; Takayuki Masui; Masako Sasaki; Motoyuki Katayama; Yuji Iwadate; Naoyuki Takei; Mitsuharu Miyoshi
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  64-Slice CT angiography of the abdominal aorta and abdominal arteries: comparison of the diagnostic efficacy of iobitridol 350 mgI/ml versus iomeprol 400 mgI/ml in a prospective, randomised, double-blind multi-centre trial.

Authors:  Christian Loewe; Christoph R Becker; Riccardo Berletti; Carlo Alberto Cametti; Jerome Caudron; Walter Coudyzer; Johan De Mey; Massimo Favat; Jean-François Heautot; Sam Heye; Markus Hittinger; Antoine Larralde; Jean-Pierre Lestrat; Roberto Marangoni; Koenraad Nieboer; Peter Reimer; Martin Schwarz; Melanie Schernthaner; Johannes Lammer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 5.315

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.