Literature DB >> 17716826

Radiotherapy with or without erythropoietin for anemic patients with head and neck cancer: a randomized trial of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG 99-03).

Mitchell Machtay1, Thomas F Pajak, Mohan Suntharalingam, George Shenouda, Diane Hershock, Diana C Stripp, Anthony J Cmelak, Alan Schulsinger, Karen K Fu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether the addition of recombinant human erythropoietin (Epo) could improve the outcomes of anemic patients receiving definitive radiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eligible patients had SCCHN, with a plan for continuous-course definitive radiotherapy (66-72 Gy) with or without chemotherapy. Patients with Stage III or IV SCCHN were required to undergo concurrent chemoradiotherapy and/or accelerated fractionation radiotherapy. Preradiotherapy hemoglobin was required to be between 9.0 g/dL and 13.5 g/dL (12.5 g/dL for women). Patients randomized to Epo received 40,000 U once weekly, starting 7-10 days before start of radiotherapy.
RESULTS: A total of 148 patients were enrolled; 141 were evaluable. Median pretreatment hemoglobin was 12.1 g/dL. Hemoglobin levels at 4 weeks rose by an average of 1.66 g/dL in the Epo arm, compared with an average 0.24 g/dL decrease in the control arm (p = 0.0001). Median follow-up was 2.5 years (3.1 years for surviving patients). There was no statistically significant difference in the primary endpoint of local-regional failure (LRF) rate between the treatment arms. The 3-year LRF rate was 36% for control and 44% for Epo (p = 0.56). There were also no significant differences in local-regional progression-free survival (LRPFS), patterns of failure, overall survival, or toxicity. The 3-year LRPFS rate was 52% for control and 47% for Epo. The overall survival rate was 57% and 56%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The addition of Epo to definitive radiotherapy for SCCHN did not improve outcomes. The study was not specifically designed to detect a potential negative association between Epo and tumor progression/survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17716826     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.04.063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  25 in total

1.  Randomized controlled trials in health technology assessment: overkill or overdue?

Authors:  Søren M Bentzen
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 6.280

2.  Monitoring for lack of benefit: a critical component of a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Boris Freidlin; Edward L Korn
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Onco-nephrology: an appraisal of the cancer and chronic kidney disease links.

Authors:  Hassan Izzedine; Mark A Perazella
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 5.992

Review 4.  The potential roles of bacteria to improve radiation treatment outcome.

Authors:  E Kouhsari; A Ghadimi-Daresajini; H Abdollahi; N Amirmozafari; S R Mahdavi; S Abbasian; S H Mousavi; H F Yaseri; M Moghaderi
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 5.  Erythropoietin or darbepoetin for patients with cancer.

Authors:  Thomy Tonia; Annette Mettler; Nadège Robert; Guido Schwarzer; Jerome Seidenfeld; Olaf Weingart; Chris Hyde; Andreas Engert; Julia Bohlius
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-12-12

Review 6.  Venous thromboembolism risk and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for the treatment of cancer-associated anemia: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sheng Gao; Jing-Jing Ma; Cheng Lu
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-01

Review 7.  Defining normoxia, physoxia and hypoxia in tumours-implications for treatment response.

Authors:  S R McKeown
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 8.  Prognostic impact of the combination of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents to cancer treatment: literature review.

Authors:  L Boulaamane; A Goncalves; S Boutayeb; P Viens; H M'rabti; F Bertucci; H Errihani
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 9.  Benefits and harms of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for anemia related to cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marcello Tonelli; Brenda Hemmelgarn; Tony Reiman; Braden Manns; M Neil Reaume; Anita Lloyd; Natasha Wiebe; Scott Klarenbach
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in oncology: a study-level meta-analysis of survival and other safety outcomes.

Authors:  J Glaspy; J Crawford; J Vansteenkiste; D Henry; S Rao; P Bowers; J A Berlin; D Tomita; K Bridges; H Ludwig
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.