Literature DB >> 17715196

Spatial and cross-modal attention alter responses to unattended sensory information in early visual and auditory human cortex.

Vivian M Ciaramitaro1, Giedrius T Buracas, Geoffrey M Boynton.   

Abstract

Attending to a visual or auditory stimulus often requires irrelevant information to be filtered out, both within the modality attended and in other modalities. For example, attentively listening to a phone conversation can diminish our ability to detect visual events. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine brain responses to visual and auditory stimuli while subjects attended visual or auditory information. Although early cortical areas are traditionally considered unimodal, we found that brain responses to the same ignored information depended on the modality attended. In early visual area V1, responses to ignored visual stimuli were weaker when attending to another visual stimulus, compared with attending to an auditory stimulus. The opposite was true in more central visual area MT+, where responses to ignored visual stimuli were weaker when attending to an auditory stimulus. Furthermore, fMRI responses to the same ignored visual information depended on the location of the auditory stimulus, with stronger responses when the attended auditory stimulus shared the same side of space as the ignored visual stimulus. In early auditory cortex, responses to ignored auditory stimuli were weaker when attending a visual stimulus. A simple parameterization of our data can describe the effects of redirecting attention across space within the same modality (spatial attention) or across modalities (cross-modal attention), and the influence of spatial attention across modalities (cross-modal spatial attention). Our results suggest that the representation of unattended information depends on whether attention is directed to another stimulus in the same modality or the same region of space.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17715196     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00580.2007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  22 in total

1.  Are you listening? Brain activation associated with sustained nonspatial auditory attention in the presence and absence of stimulation.

Authors:  Anna Seydell-Greenwald; Adam S Greenberg; Josef P Rauschecker
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Auditory modulation of visual apparent motion with short spatial and temporal intervals.

Authors:  Hulusi Kafaligonul; Gene R Stoner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Auditory motion processing after early blindness.

Authors:  Fang Jiang; G Christopher Stecker; Ione Fine
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Linguistic asymmetry, egocentric anchoring, and sensory modality as factors for the observed association between time and space perception.

Authors:  Eunice E Hang Choy; Him Cheung
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2017-05-17

5.  Brain activity during time to contact estimation: an EEG study.

Authors:  Asieh Daneshi; Hamed Azarnoush; Farzad Towhidkhah; Delphine Bernardin; Jocelyn Faubert
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 5.082

6.  Overlapping Anatomical Networks Convey Cross-Modal Suppression in the Sighted and Coactivation of "Visual" and Auditory Cortex in the Blind.

Authors:  Irina Anurova; Synnöve Carlson; Josef P Rauschecker
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Object-based attention to one of two superimposed surfaces alters responses in human early visual cortex.

Authors:  Vivian M Ciaramitaro; Jude F Mitchell; Gene R Stoner; John H Reynolds; Geoffrey M Boynton
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 8.  Spikes, BOLD, attention, and awareness: a comparison of electrophysiological and fMRI signals in V1.

Authors:  Geoffrey M Boynton
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Re-examining overlap between tactile and visual motion responses within hMT+ and STS.

Authors:  Fang Jiang; Michael S Beauchamp; Ione Fine
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 10.  Using neuroimaging to understand the cortical mechanisms of auditory selective attention.

Authors:  Adrian K C Lee; Eric Larson; Ross K Maddox; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.