Literature DB >> 17714947

The prevalence of intrinsic subtypes and prognosis in breast cancer patients of different races.

Junichi Kurebayashi1, Takuya Moriya, Takanori Ishida, Hisashi Hirakawa, Masafumi Kurosumi, Futoshi Akiyama, Takayuki Kinoshita, Hiroyuki Takei, Kaoru Takahashi, Masahiko Ikeda, Kazutaka Nakashima.   

Abstract

A recent report indicated that a high prevalence of basal-like breast tumors (estrogen receptor [ER]-negative, progesterone receptor [PR]-negative, human epidermal growth factor receptor [HER] 2-negative, and cytokeratin 5/6-positive and/or HER1-positive) could contribute to a poor prognosis in African American women with breast cancer. It has been reported that Japanese women with breast cancer have a significantly better survival rate than other races in the USA. These findings suggest that breast cancers in Japanese women have favorable biological characteristics. To clarify this hypothesis, we conducted a cohort study to investigate the prevalence of intrinsic subtypes and prognosis for each subtype in 793 Japanese patients. This study revealed a very low prevalence (only 8%) of basal-like breast tumors with aggressive biological characteristics in Japanese patients. Survival analysis showed a significantly poorer prognosis in patients with basal-like tumors than in those with luminal A tumors (ER- and/or PR-positive, and HER2-negative) with favorable biological characteristics. These findings support the hypothesis that breast cancers in Japanese women have more favorable biological characteristics and a better prognosis than those in other races. In conclusion, the prevalence of basal-like breast tumors could influence the prognosis of breast cancer patients of different races. The prevalence of intrinsic subtypes should be taken into account when analyzing survival data in a multi-racial/international clinical study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17714947     DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2007.07.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast        ISSN: 0960-9776            Impact factor:   4.380


  49 in total

1.  Comprehensive profiling of biological processes reveals two major prognostic subtypes in breast cancer.

Authors:  Fei Chen; Sheng Gao; Fengliang Wang; Jingjing Ma; Min Zhang; Mingming Lv; Qian Zhou; Ziyi Fu; Cheng Lu; Hong Yin
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-10-07

2.  Progression of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ from the Pathological Perspective.

Authors:  Pedro Oscar R Cunha; Mark Ornstein; J Louise Jones
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 3.  Triple-negative breast cancer: disease entity or title of convenience?

Authors:  Lisa Carey; Eric Winer; Giuseppe Viale; David Cameron; Luca Gianni
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  Breast cancer subtypes and previously established genetic risk factors: a bayesian approach.

Authors:  Katie M O'Brien; Stephen R Cole; Lawrence S Engel; Jeannette T Bensen; Charles Poole; Amy H Herring; Robert C Millikan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Ethnic disparities in breast tumor phenotypic subtypes in Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women.

Authors:  Lisa M Hines; Betsy Risendal; Tim Byers; Sarah Mengshol; Jan Lowery; Meenakshi Singh
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Intrinsic subtypes from PAM50 gene expression assay in a population-based breast cancer cohort: differences by age, race, and tumor characteristics.

Authors:  Carol Sweeney; Philip S Bernard; Rachel E Factor; Marilyn L Kwan; Laurel A Habel; Charles P Quesenberry; Kaylynn Shakespear; Erin K Weltzien; Inge J Stijleman; Carole A Davis; Mark T W Ebbert; Adrienne Castillo; Lawrence H Kushi; Bette J Caan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Prevalence of molecular subtypes of invasive breast cancer: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Nikhilesh Kumar; Preeti Patni; A Agarwal; M A Khan; Nidhi Parashar
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2015-06-17

8.  A profile of prognostic and molecular factors in European and Māori breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Gabi U Dachs; Maiko Kano; Ekaterina Volkova; Helen R Morrin; Valerie C L Davey; Gavin C Harris; Michelle Cheale; Christopher Frampton; Margaret J Currie; J Elisabeth Wells; Bridget A Robinson
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-10-10       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Triple negative breast carcinoma is a prognostic factor in Taiwanese women.

Authors:  Che Lin; Su-Yu Chien; Li-Sheng Chen; Shou-Jen Kuo; Tsai-Wang Chang; Dar-Ren Chen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Epidemiology of breast cancer subtypes in two prospective cohort studies of breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Marilyn L Kwan; Lawrence H Kushi; Erin Weltzien; Benjamin Maring; Susan E Kutner; Regan S Fulton; Marion M Lee; Christine B Ambrosone; Bette J Caan
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.