Literature DB >> 17714625

Applications and interpretation of computer-assisted sperm analyses and sperm sorting methods in assisted breeding and comparative research.

William V Holt1, Justine O'Brien, Teresa Abaigar.   

Abstract

Theoretical and practical knowledge of sperm function is an essential requirement in almost every aspect of modern reproductive technology, if the overarching objective is the eventual production of live offspring. Artificial insemination (AI) techniques depend on the availability of high quality semen, whether fresh, diluted and stored, or frozen. Assessing such semen for quality and the likelihood of fertility is therefore also important, as much time, resources and effort can easily be wasted by using poor samples. Some semen technologies are aimed not at quality assessment, but at attempting to skew the breeding outcomes. Sex preselection by separating the male- and female-bearing spermatozoa using flow cytometry is now practised routinely in the agricultural industry, but speculatively it may eventually be possible to use other genetic markers besides the sex chromosomes. A moment's reflection shows that although sex-biasing flow cytometry technology is well developed and generally fulfils its purpose if presorting of sperm quality is adequate, other technologies aimed specifically at semen assessment are also sophisticated but provide inadequate data that say little about fertility. This is especially true of instrumentation for objective sperm motility assessment. Here we aim to examine this technological paradox and suggest that although the sperm assessment equipment might be sophisticated, the shortcomings probably lie largely with inappropriate objectives and data interpretation. We also aim to review the potential value and use of sperm sexing technology for non-domestic species, arguing in this case that the limitations also lie less with the technology itself than with the applications envisaged. Finally, the potential application of a sorting method directed at motility rather than sperm DNA content is discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17714625     DOI: 10.1071/rd07037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Fertil Dev        ISSN: 1031-3613            Impact factor:   2.311


  12 in total

1.  Objective assessment of sperm motion characteristics of Malpura ram lambs raised under intensive management system in semiarid tropical environment.

Authors:  Davendra Kumar; Anil Joshi; S M K Naqvi
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 1.559

Review 2.  Considerations of viscosity in the preliminaries to mammalian fertilisation.

Authors:  Ronald H F Hunter; P Coy; J Gadea; D Rath
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Fish Sperm Assessment Using Software and Cooling Devices.

Authors:  Carina Caldeira; Carles Soler
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-07-28       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Cryoprotection synergism between glycerol and dimethyl sulfoxide improves the mitochondrial transmembrane potential, plasmalemma, acrosomal and DNA integrities, and in vivo fertility of water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) spermatozoa.

Authors:  Syed Aftab Hussain Shah; Syed Murtaza Hassan Andrabi; Hussain Ahmed; Irfan Zia Qureshi
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.058

Review 5.  Harnessing the value of reproductive hormones in cattle production with considerations to animal welfare and human health.

Authors:  Holly C Evans; Elanie F Briggs; Randy H Burnett; Zully E Contreras-Correa; Morgan A Duvic; Lacey M Dysart; Alicia A Gilmore; Riley D Messman; Dana Reid; Muhammet Rasit Ugur; Abdullah Kaya; Erdogan Memili
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.338

6.  An automatic system to study sperm motility and energetics.

Authors:  Linda Z Shi; Jaclyn M Nascimento; Charlie Chandsawangbhuwana; Elliot L Botvinick; Michael W Berns
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.838

Review 7.  Ethical considerations in sex selection.

Authors:  Tasnim Eghbal Eftekhaari; Abdol Azim Nejatizadeh; Minoo Rajaei; Saeede Soleimanian; Soghra Fallahi; Rahman Ghaffarzadegan; Forough Mahmoudi
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2015-05-19

8.  Inter relationship between some routine semen evaluation parameters in Jersey X local hill cattle crossbred bulls.

Authors:  M Sharma; M Singh; S Kapoor; S Jasial
Journal:  Open Vet J       Date:  2012-05-01

9.  Environmental chemicals impact dog semen quality in vitro and may be associated with a temporal decline in sperm motility and increased cryptorchidism.

Authors:  Richard G Lea; Andrew S Byers; Rebecca N Sumner; Stewart M Rhind; Zulin Zhang; Sarah L Freeman; Rachel Moxon; Holly M Richardson; Martin Green; Jim Craigon; Gary C W England
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Assessment of semen quality in pure and crossbred Jersey bulls.

Authors:  Umesh Kumar; Ajay P Gawande; Sunil K Sahatpure; Manoj S Patil; Chetan K Lakde; Sachin W Bonde; Pradnyankur L Borkar; Ajay J Poharkar; Baldeo R Ramteke
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2015-10-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.