Literature DB >> 17710982

Diagnostic accuracy of MRI/MRSI for patients with persistently high PSA levels and negative TRUS-guided biopsy results.

Cathleeyakorn Bhatia1, Sith Phongkitkarun, Dechaphol Booranapitaksonti, Wachira Kochakarn, Panas Chaleumsanyakorn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate the accuracy of transrectal ultrasonographic (TRUS)-guided biopsies by using combined magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) in patients with persistently high prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and negative TRUS-guided biopsy results. MATERIAL AND
METHOD: Twenty-one patients (age range 50-77 years, average 61.4 years) with negative TRUS biopsy were enrolled Suspicious areas were identified by discrete low signal intensity in T2 on standard MRI. MRSI was interpreted by using spectral approach and given score of I (benign) to 5 (malignant). Suspicious voxels were localized for guided TRUS biopsy. All patients underwent sextant TRUS biopsies with up to four additional biopsies targeted at suspicious sites. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI/MRSI in patient-by-patient and voxel-by-core were analyzed.
RESULTS: Prostate cancer was detected in 2 of 21 patients (9.5%). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of combined MRI/MRSI for detection of prostate cancer were 100%, 84%, 40%, 100%, and 86%, respectively. The site of positive biopsy correlated correctly with voxels were 80%, 85%, 21%, 99% and 85% on sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy, respectively.
CONCLUSION: MRI/MRSI have the potential to guide biopsy to cancer foci in patients with persistently high PSA levels and prior negative TRUS biopsy results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17710982

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Assoc Thai        ISSN: 0125-2208


  7 in total

1.  Endoclipping treatment of life-threatening rectal bleeding after prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Panagiotis Katsinelos; Jannis Kountouras; Georgios Dimitriadis; Grigoris Chatzimavroudis; Christos Zavos; Ioannis Pilpilidis; George Paroutoglou; George Germanidis; Kostas Mimidis
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  [Imaging modalities for primary diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer].

Authors:  U G Mueller-Lisse; K Miller
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  The evaluation of prostate lesions with IVIM DWI and MR perfusion parameters at 3T MRI.

Authors:  Murat Beyhan; Recep Sade; Erdem Koc; Senol Adanur; Mecit Kantarci
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 4.  Combined magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Martin Umbehr; Lucas M Bachmann; Ulrike Held; Thomas M Kessler; Tullio Sulser; Dominik Weishaupt; John Kurhanewicz; Johann Steurer
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 5.  MRI-targeted prostate biopsy: a review of technique and results.

Authors:  Nicola L Robertson; Mark Emberton; Caroline M Moore
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 6.  A systematic review on multiparametric MR imaging in prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  Roberta Fusco; Mario Sansone; Vincenza Granata; Sergio Venanzio Setola; Antonella Petrillo
Journal:  Infect Agent Cancer       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 2.965

7.  Repeat prostate biopsy strategies after initial negative biopsy: meta-regression comparing cancer detection of transperineal, transrectal saturation and MRI guided biopsy.

Authors:  Adam W Nelson; Rebecca C Harvey; Richard A Parker; Christof Kastner; Andrew Doble; Vincent J Gnanapragasam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.