Literature DB >> 17710157

Validation of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging-derived vascular permeability measurements using quantitative autoradiography in the RG2 rat brain tumor model.

Moira C Ferrier1, Hemant Sarin, Steve H Fung, Bawarjan Schatlo, Ryszard M Pluta, Sandeep N Gupta, Peter L Choyke, Edward H Oldfield, David Thomasson, John A Butman.   

Abstract

Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) is widely used to evaluate tumor permeability, yet measurements have not been directly validated in brain tumors. Our purpose was to compare estimates of forward leakage K(trans) derived from DCE-MRI to the estimates K obtained using [(14)C]aminoisobutyric acid quantitative autoradiography ([(14)C]AIB QAR), an established method of evaluating blood-tumor barrier permeability. Both DCE-MRI and [(14)C]AIB QAR were performed in five rats 9 to 11 days following tumor implantation. K(trans) in the tumor was estimated from DCE-MRI using the threeparameter general kinetic model and a measured vascular input function. K(i) was estimated from QAR data using regions of interest (ROI) closely corresponding to those used to estimate K(trans). K(trans) and K(i) correlated with each other for two independent sets of central tumor ROI (R = 0.905, P = .035; R = 0.933, P = .021). In an additional six rats, K(trans) was estimated on two occasions to show reproducibility (intraclass coefficient = 0.9993; coefficient of variance = 6.07%). In vivo blood-tumor permeability parameters derived from DCE-MRI are reproducible and correlate with the gold standard for quantifying blood tumor barrier permeability, [(14)C]AIB QAR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17710157      PMCID: PMC1939929          DOI: 10.1593/neo.07289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neoplasia        ISSN: 1476-5586            Impact factor:   5.715


  35 in total

Review 1.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

Review 2.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in oncology.

Authors:  M V Knopp; F L Giesel; H Marcos; H von Tengg-Kobligk; P Choyke
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2001-08

3.  Rapid combined T1 and T2 mapping using gradient recalled acquisition in the steady state.

Authors:  Sean C L Deoni; Brian K Rutt; Terry M Peters
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging kinetic parameters and molecular weight of dendritic contrast agents in tumor angiogenesis in mice.

Authors:  Quido G de Lussanet; Sander Langereis; Regina G H Beets-Tan; Marcel H P van Genderen; Arjan W Griffioen; Jos M A van Engelshoven; Walter H Backes
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-02-24       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Visualization of thalamic nuclei on high resolution, multi-averaged T1 and T2 maps acquired at 1.5 T.

Authors:  Sean C L Deoni; Melanie J C Josseau; Brian K Rutt; Terry M Peters
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Measurement error.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-09-21

7.  Measurement error and correlation coefficients.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-07-06

8.  Tumor microvascular characterization using ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide particles (USPIO) in an experimental breast cancer model.

Authors:  K Turetschek; T P Roberts; E Floyd; A Preda; V Novikov; D M Shames; W O Carter; R C Brasch
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in human muscle and tumours: comparison of quantitative and semi-quantitative analysis.

Authors:  Susan M Galbraith; Martin A Lodge; N Jane Taylor; Gordon J S Rustin; Søren Bentzen; J James Stirling; Anwar R Padhani
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.044

10.  Temporal sampling requirements for the tracer kinetics modeling of breast disease.

Authors:  E Henderson; B K Rutt; T Y Lee
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.546

View more
  38 in total

Review 1.  In vivo methods to study uptake of nanoparticles into the brain.

Authors:  Inge van Rooy; Serpil Cakir-Tascioglu; Wim E Hennink; Gert Storm; Raymond M Schiffelers; Enrico Mastrobattista
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  The concordance of MRI and quantitative autoradiography estimates of the transvascular transfer rate constant of albumin in a rat brain tumor model.

Authors:  Ramesh Paudyal; James R Ewing; Tavarekere N Nagaraja; Hassan Bagher-Ebadian; Robert A Knight; Swayamprava Panda; Mei Lu; Karyn Ledbetter; Joseph D Fenstermacher
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 3.  Diffusion-weighted (DW) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for monitoring anticancer therapy.

Authors:  Anwar R Padhani; Aftab Alam Khan
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2010-04-11       Impact factor: 4.493

Review 4.  Rat brain tumor models in experimental neuro-oncology: the C6, 9L, T9, RG2, F98, BT4C, RT-2 and CNS-1 gliomas.

Authors:  Rolf F Barth; Balveen Kaur
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 5.  A review of imaging agent development.

Authors:  Eric D Agdeppa; Mary E Spilker
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 4.009

6.  Prediction of radiosensitivity in primary central nervous system germ cell tumors using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Chenlu Feng; Peiyi Gao; Xiaoguang Qiu; Tianyi Qian; Yan Lin; Jian Zhou; Binbin Sui
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.087

7.  The War on Cancer rages on.

Authors:  Alnawaz Rehemtulla
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.715

8.  High resolution ultra high field magnetic resonance imaging of glioma microvascularity and hypoxia using ultra-small particles of iron oxide.

Authors:  Gregory A Christoforidis; Ming Yang; Marinos S Kontzialis; Douglas G Larson; Amir Abduljalil; Michelle Basso; Weilian Yang; Abhik Ray-Chaudhury; Johannes Heverhagen; Michael V Knopp; Rolf F Barth
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 6.016

9.  Effective transvascular delivery of nanoparticles across the blood-brain tumor barrier into malignant glioma cells.

Authors:  Hemant Sarin; Ariel S Kanevsky; Haitao Wu; Kyle R Brimacombe; Steve H Fung; Alioscka A Sousa; Sungyoung Auh; Colin M Wilson; Kamal Sharma; Maria A Aronova; Richard D Leapman; Gary L Griffiths; Matthew D Hall
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 5.531

Review 10.  Recent progress towards development of effective systemic chemotherapy for the treatment of malignant brain tumors.

Authors:  Hemant Sarin
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 5.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.