Literature DB >> 17709452

Surrogate markers of insulin resistance are associated with consumption of sugar-sweetened drinks and fruit juice in middle and older-aged adults.

Makiko Yoshida1, Nicola M McKeown, Gail Rogers, James B Meigs, Edward Saltzman, Ralph D'Agostino, Paul F Jacques.   

Abstract

In this study, we examined the association between sugar-sweetened drink, diet soda, and fruit juice consumption and surrogate measures of insulin resistance. Sugar-sweetened drink, diet soda, and fruit juice consumption was estimated using a semiquantitative FFQ in 2500 subjects at the fifth examination (1991-1995) of the Framingham Offspring Study. Surrogate markers of insulin resistance measured in this study included fasting insulin, fasting glucose, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance, and the insulin sensitivity index (ISI(0,120)). Sugar-sweetened drink consumption was positively associated with fasting insulin (none vs. > or = 2 servings/d, 188 vs. 206 pmol/L, P-trend <0.001) after adjusting for potential confounders. Sugar-sweetened drink consumption was not associated with fasting glucose or ISI(0,120). Fruit juice consumption was inversely associated with fasting glucose (none vs. > or = 2 servings/d, 5.28 vs. 5.18 mmol/L, P-trend = 0.006), but not with fasting insulin (none vs. > or = 2 servings/d, 200 vs. 188 pmol/L, P-trend = 0.37) or ISI(0,120) (none vs. > or = 2 servings/d, 26.0 vs. 27.0, P-trend = 0.19) in multivariate models. Diet soda consumption was not associated with any surrogate measures of insulin resistance after adjustment for potential confounders (insulin: none vs. > or = 2 servings/d, 195 vs. 193 pmol/L, P-trend = 0.59; glucose: 5.26 vs. 5.24 mmol/L, P-trend = 0.84; and ISI(0,120): 26.2 vs. 26.7, P-trend = 0.37). In these healthy adults, sugar-sweetened drink consumption appears to be unfavorably associated with surrogate measures reflecting hepatic more than peripheral insulin sensitivity. Studies of long-term beverage consumption using more direct measures of insulin sensitivity are clearly warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17709452     DOI: 10.1093/jn/137.9.2121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr        ISSN: 0022-3166            Impact factor:   4.798


  33 in total

1.  Cumulative soft drink consumption is associated with insulin resistance in Mexican adults.

Authors:  Berenice Rivera-Paredez; Leticia Torres-Ibarra; Romina González-Morales; Tonatiuh Barrientos-Gutiérrez; Rubí Hernández-López; Paula Ramírez; Leith León-Maldonado; Rafael Velázquez-Cruz; Edgar Denova-Gutiérrez; Jorge Salmerón
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 7.045

2.  Diet soft drink consumption is associated with an increased risk of vascular events in the Northern Manhattan Study.

Authors:  Hannah Gardener; Tatjana Rundek; Matthew Markert; Clinton B Wright; Mitchell S V Elkind; Ralph L Sacco
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Metabolic responses to prolonged consumption of glucose- and fructose-sweetened beverages are not associated with postprandial or 24-h glucose and insulin excursions.

Authors:  Kimber L Stanhope; Steven C Griffen; Andrew A Bremer; Roel G Vink; Ernst J Schaefer; Katsuyuki Nakajima; Jean-Marc Schwarz; Carine Beysen; Lars Berglund; Nancy L Keim; Peter J Havel
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  Soft drinks consumption is associated with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease independent of metabolic syndrome in Chinese population.

Authors:  Ge Meng; Bo Zhang; Fei Yu; Chunlei Li; Qing Zhang; Li Liu; Hongmei Wu; Yang Xia; Xue Bao; Hongbin Shi; Qian Su; Yeqing Gu; Liyun Fang; Huijun Yang; Bin Yu; Shaomei Sun; Xing Wang; Ming Zhou; Qiyu Jia; Huanli Jiao; Bangmao Wang; Qi Guo; Livia A Carvalhoa; Zhong Sun; Kun Song; Ming Yu; Kaijun Niu
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 5.614

Review 5.  Fructose consumption: recent results and their potential implications.

Authors:  Kimber L Stanhope; Peter J Havel
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 6.  Sugar consumption, metabolic disease and obesity: The state of the controversy.

Authors:  Kimber L Stanhope
Journal:  Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 6.250

7.  Sugar-sweetened beverages and prevalence of the metabolically abnormal phenotype in the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  Angela K Green; Paul F Jacques; Gail Rogers; Caroline S Fox; James B Meigs; Nicola M McKeown
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 5.002

8.  Cross-sectional association of dietary patterns with insulin-resistant phenotypes among adults without diabetes in the Framingham Offspring Study.

Authors:  Enju Liu; Nicola M McKeown; P K Newby; James B Meigs; Ramachandran S Vasan; Paula A Quatromoni; Ralph B D'Agostino; Paul F Jacques
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2009-02-16       Impact factor: 3.718

9.  The public health and economic benefits of taxing sugar-sweetened beverages.

Authors:  Kelly D Brownell; Thomas Farley; Walter C Willett; Barry M Popkin; Frank J Chaloupka; Joseph W Thompson; David S Ludwig
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Prospective study of pre-gravid sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Liwei Chen; Frank B Hu; Edwina Yeung; Walter Willett; Cuilin Zhang
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 19.112

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.