Literature DB >> 17708564

Coracoid process anatomy: implications in radiographic imaging and surgery.

Deepak N Bhatia1, Joe F de Beer, Donald F du Toit.   

Abstract

The coracoid process forms an important part of scapular-glenoid construct and is involved in many surgical procedures on the glenohumeral joint. The unique three-dimensional orientation of each coracoid pillar makes radiographic imaging difficult. Congenital variations and minimal traumatic/iatrogenic changes in this orientation can predispose to subcoracoid impingement. We performed a quantitative and statistical analysis of the osseous anatomy of the coracoid process in 101 scapulae; the purpose was to determine the anatomical variations and gender-specific differences in the length, breadth, thickness, vertical and horizontal projections, and triplane angulations of each individual coracoid pillar. All parameters were measured in reference to the glenoid plane to ensure surgical and radiological applicability. The mean dimensions of the inferior coracoid pillar were 31.1 x 16.6 x 9.9 mm and that of the superior coracoid pillar were 41.7 x 14.2 x 8.4 mm (medial)/6.6 mm (lateral). The mean maximal harvestable coracoid length measured 19.0 mm. The mean angular orientation of the inferior coracoid pillar, with reference to the glenoid, measured 51.2 degrees (axial), 126.1 degrees (sagittal), and 134.6 degrees (coronal), and that of the superior coracoid pillar measured 146.1 degrees (axial) with an interpillar angulation of 84.9 degrees (axial). A statistically significant gender difference (P < 0.05) was found in the lengths, breadths, and projections of each coracoid pillar. We used data from this study to devise two new radiographic views (for imaging individual coracoid pillars), to calculate dimensions and orientation of internal fixation/prosthetic hardware during surgery, and conceptualize a geometric model to explain the role of measured parameters in coracoid impingement syndrome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17708564     DOI: 10.1002/ca.20525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Anat        ISSN: 0897-3806            Impact factor:   2.414


  12 in total

1.  Reliability of a CT reconstruction for preoperative surgical planning in the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure.

Authors:  Alexandre Hardy; Philippe Loriaut; Benjamin Granger; Ahmed Neffati; Audrey Massein; Laurent Casabianca; Hugues Pascal-Moussellard; Antoine Gerometta
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Coracoid stress fracture in an elite fast bowler: description of a technique for CT-guided percutaneous screw fixation of coracoid fractures.

Authors:  Graeme Thompson; Andrew Van Den Heever
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Coracoid Impingement and Morphology Is Associated with Fatty Infiltration and Rotator Cuff Tears.

Authors:  Saadiq F El-Amin; Nicola Maffulli; Matthew C Mai; Hugo C Rodriguez; Victoria Jaso; Dylan Cannon; Ashim Gupta
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Noncomminuted lateral end clavicle fractures associated with coracoclavicular ligament disruption: Technical considerations for optimal anatomic fixation and stability.

Authors:  Richard S Page; Deepak N Bhatia
Journal:  Int J Shoulder Surg       Date:  2014-07

5.  Anatomic Variation in Morphometry of Human Coracoid Process among Asian Population.

Authors:  Manal Fathi; Pike-See Cheah; Umar Ahmad; M Nizlan Nasir; Aye Aye San; Ezamin Abdul Rahim; Paisal Hussin; Rozi Mahmud; Fauziah Othman
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Anatomic Study of Subcoracoid Morphology in 418 Shoulders: Potential Implications for Subcoracoid Impingement.

Authors:  Anthony J Dugarte; Rocklend J Davis; T Sean Lynch; Mark S Schickendantz; Lutul D Farrow
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-10-16

7.  The "coracoid tunnel view": a simulation study for finding the optimal screw trajectory in coracoid base fracture fixation.

Authors:  C H van Trikt; J G G Dobbe; J C E Donders; G J Streekstra; P Kloen
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 1.246

8.  A guideline for screw fixation of coracoid process base fracture by 3D simulation.

Authors:  Zhongye Sun; Hao Li; Bei Wang; Jun Yan; Liren Han; Shizhang Han; Xiaofei Yang; Bei Zhao
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  The co-occurrence of a four-headed coracobrachialis muscle, split coracoid process and tunnel for the median and musculocutaneous nerves: the potential clinical relevance of a very rare variation.

Authors:  Łukasz Olewnik; Nicol Zielinska; Piotr Karauda; Fabrice Duparc; Georgi P Georgiev; Michał Polguj
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2020-09-26       Impact factor: 1.246

10.  Coracoid Process Morphology using 3D-CT Imaging in a Malaysian Population.

Authors:  I I Imma; N M Nizlan; A R Ezamin; S Yusoff; M H Shukur
Journal:  Malays Orthop J       Date:  2017-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.