Literature DB >> 17705762

Pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty in a referral center: lessons learned.

Luis H Braga1, Joao Pippi-Salle, Armando J Lorenzo, Darius Bagli, Antoine E Khoury, Walid A Farhat.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We present our first-year experience with pediatric transperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty (TLDP) in a large referral center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A chart review was conducted in 27 consecutive children (M:F 23:4) aged 4 to 17 years (mean 9.7 years) with ureteropelvic junction obstruction who underwent TLDP (21 on the left, 6 on the right) in 2005. The key steps implemented to facilitate and streamline this procedure were: (1) clamping the Foley catheter before surgery to distend the renal pelvis and facilitate the transmesenteric approach; (2) stabilizing the renal pelvis with a traction suture; (3) performing the dismembered pyeloplasty using a modified double-armed suture; and (4) placing the ureteral stent percutaneously antegrade before completing the anastomosis. Operative time, hospital stay, complications, and follow-up radiologic studies were reviewed.
RESULTS: The TLDP was performed with no open conversions. Crossing vessels and horseshoe kidney were present in 8 patients and 2 patients, respectively. The mean operative time was 221 minutes. Stent insertion was successful in all but one patient. Postoperative pain management was successful in all 27 patients. There were 4 postoperative complications (14.8%) consisting of prolonged leakage in two, obstruction in one, and obstruction with pyelonephritis in one. These last two complications occurred early in our experience and were treated successfully by percutaneous nephrostomy with subsequent retrograde endopyelotomy. The average hospital stay was 2.1 days (range 1-4 days). Radiologic studies 8 to 20 months after removal of the Double-J stents showed reduction of the degree of hydronephrosis in all patients.
CONCLUSION: Our 1-year experience with TLDP gave us the opportunity to implement key steps to establish a standardized technique for this procedure. Although the follow-up period was short, most complications occurred early in this series, demonstrating that a learning curve is inevitable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17705762     DOI: 10.1089/end.2006.0420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  8 in total

1.  Effectiveness of basic endoscopic surgical skill training for pediatric surgeons.

Authors:  Satoshi Ieiri; Takanori Nakatsuji; Mayumi Higashi; Junko Akiyoshi; Munenori Uemura; Kouzou Konishi; Manabu Onimaru; Kenoki Ohuchida; Jaesung Hong; Morimasa Tomikawa; Kazuo Tanoue; Makoto Hashizume; Tomoaki Taguchi
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Prospective cost analysis of laparoscopic vs. open pyeloplasty in children: Single centre contemporary evaluation comparing two procedures over a 1-year period.

Authors:  Katherine Moore; Armando J Lorenzo; Suzanne Turner; Darius J Bägli; Joao L Pippi Salle; Walid A Farhat
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Instituting robotic pediatric urologic surgery in the Canadian healthcare system: Evaluating the feasibility and outcomes of robot-assisted pyeloplasty and ureteric reimplantation.

Authors:  Noah Stern; Peter Wang; Sumit Dave
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Retroperitoneal laparoscopic non-dismembered pyeloplasty for uretero-pelvic junction obstruction due to crossing vessels: A matched-paired analysis and review of literature.

Authors:  Jens Rassweiler; Jan Klein; Ali Serdar Goezen
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2018-03-06

5.  Transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: does upper urinary tract anomalies affect surgical outcomes?

Authors:  João Arthur Brunhara; Paulo Renato Marcelo Moscardi; Marcos Figueiredo Mello; Hiury Silva Andrade; Paulo Afonso Carvalho; Bruno Nicolino Cezarino; Francisco Tibor Dénes; Roberto Iglesias Lopes
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

6.  Transmesocolic approach for left side laparoscopic pyeloplasty: comparison with laterocolic approach in the initial learning period.

Authors:  Hyun Ho Han; Won Sik Ham; Jang Hwan Kim; Chang Hee Hong; Young Deuk Choi; Sang Won Han; Byung Ha Chung
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 2.759

7.  Prospective randomized study to evaluate the feasibility and outcome of transmesocolic laparoscopic pyeloplasty and compare it with retrocolic laparoscopic pyeloplasty in pediatric and adolescent patients.

Authors:  Sanjeet Kumar Singh; Jatinder Kumar; A N Sachin; Rakesh Kapoor; Aneesh Srivastava; M S Ansari
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2014-07

8.  Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children: experience of 226 cases at one centre.

Authors:  Marcin Polok; Dominika Borselle; Krystian Toczewski; Wojciech Apoznański; Diana Jędrzejuk; Dariusz Patkowski
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 3.318

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.