Literature DB >> 17705242

A prospective randomized trial comparing contrast-enhanced targeted versus systematic ultrasound guided biopsies: impact on prostate cancer detection.

Michael Mitterberger1, Wolfgang Horninger, Alexandre Pelzer, Hannes Strasser, Georg Bartsch, Patrizia Moser, Ethan J Halpern, Johann Gradl, Friedrich Aigner, Leo Pallwein, Ferdinand Frauscher.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We performed a prospective randomized trial comparing 5 contrast-enhanced color Doppler (CECD) ultrasound (US) targeted biopsy cores to 10 gray-scale US guided systematic biopsy (SB) cores to determine the impact on the cancer detection rate.
METHODS: We prospectively randomized 100 prostate specific antigen (PSA) screening volunteers with an elevated PSA (> or =1.25 ng/ml and free-to-total PSA < 18%) to undergo contrast-enhanced targeted or SB. Contrast-enhanced targeted biopsies with a limited number of five cores were performed into hypervascular areas of the peripheral zone (PZ) during administration of the US contrast agent SonoVue (Bracco, Italy). A subjective grading of the vascularity from 0 to 3 was used: grade 0, no color signal; 1, low density; 2, medium density; and 3, high density of color signals. Ten SBs were obtained in a standard spatial distribution. Cancer detection rates were compared in the groups.
RESULTS: Cancer was detected in 16/50 subjects (32%) by targeted biopsy, and in 13/50 patients (26%) with SB. The cancer detection rate was significantly better for the targeted approach (P < 0.04, McNemar). The detection rate for targeted biopsy cores (15.6% or 39/250 cores) was significantly better than for SB cores (6.8% or 34/500 cores, P < 0.001, McNemar).
CONCLUSIONS: CECD targeted biopsy detected more cancers than SB with a reduced number of biopsy cores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17705242     DOI: 10.1002/pros.20639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate        ISSN: 0270-4137            Impact factor:   4.104


  20 in total

Review 1.  Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: an update.

Authors:  Nathan Lawrentschuk; Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  [Multiparametric MRI, elastography, contrastenhanced TRUS. Are there indications with reliable diagnostic advantages before prostate biopsy?].

Authors:  A Hegele; L Skrobek; R Hofmann; P Olbert
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  [Urological update seminar "UroUpdate". Comprehensive 2-day course in continuing education].

Authors:  U Ayazpoor
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Endorectal multiparametric 3-tesla magnetic resonance imaging associated with systematic cognitive biopsies does not increase prostate cancer detection rate: a randomized prospective trial.

Authors:  Gianluigi Taverna; Giorgio Bozzini; Fabio Grizzi; Mauro Seveso; Alberto Mandressi; Luca Balzarini; Federica Mrakic; Pietro Bono; Oliviero De Franceco; NicolòMaria Buffi; Giovanni Lughezzani; Massimo Lazzeri; Paolo Casale; Giorgio Ferruccio Guazzoni
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Comparative efficiency of contrast-enhanced colour Doppler ultrasound targeted versus systematic biopsy for prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  Michael Josef Mitterberger; Friedrich Aigner; Wolfgang Horninger; Hanno Ulmer; Silvio Cavuto; Ethan J Halpern; Ferdinand Frauscher
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Factors influencing the degree of enhancement of prostate cancer on contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasonography: correlation with biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  J Jiang; Y-Q Chen; Y-K Zhu; X-H Yao; J Qi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 7.  Active surveillance as a practical strategy to differentiate lethal and non-lethal prostate cancer subtypes.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Kakehi
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.285

8.  Contrast enhanced transrectal ultrasound for the detection of prostate cancer: a randomized, double-blind trial of dutasteride pretreatment.

Authors:  Ethan J Halpern; Leonard G Gomella; Flemming Forsberg; Peter A McCue; Edouard J Trabulsi
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Modalities for imaging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  A H Hou; D Swanson; A B Barqawi
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2010-03-17

Review 10.  Ultrasound of the prostate.

Authors:  Michael Mitterberger; Wolfgang Horninger; Friedrich Aigner; Germar M Pinggera; Ilona Steppan; Peter Rehder; Ferdinand Frauscher
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.