Literature DB >> 17705081

Endoscopic harvest of saphenous vein: a lesson learned from 1,348 cases.

K-M Chiu1, C-L Chen, S-H Chu, T-Y Lin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic harvest of saphenous vein is a relatively new technique developed to minimize the wound and postoperative complications. This technique has gained patients' acceptance and become popular in cardiac surgical practices. Because most centers have limited experience with this approach, the authors summarize the clinical profiles of patients undergoing endoscopic vessel harvest (EVH).
METHODS: Between March 2001 and August 2006, 1,348 patients (945 men and 403 women) with a mean age of 67.2 years (range, 28-89 years) underwent EVH of saphenous vein for coronary artery bypass surgery, peripheral artery reconstruction, and miscellaneous conditions. The EVH technique was performed using the Vasoview system (Guidant, Menlo Park, CA, USA) under the assistance of carbon dioxide (CO(2)) insufflation.
RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in 98.6% of the cases. Two saphenous veins were discarded because of obvious vein injury. The mean harvest time was 45 min: 68 min for the first 50 cases and 23 min for the last 200 cases. Nearly all the patients (98%) had saphenous vein harvested only from the thighs, whereas only 1.5% of the patients had saphenous vein harvested from the legs. Postoperative wound complications were experienced by 61 patients including 25 tract hematomas, 19 wound dehiscences or poor healing, 16 wound infections, and 1 overlying skin necrosis. Overall, 13 subsequent revisions were required for these complications. Detectable air embolisms occurred for 143 patients and numbness in the saphenous nerve territory for 169 patients.
CONCLUSION: The findings showed EVH of saphenous vein to be a valid alternative to open saphenectomy, providing excellent surgical results. Therefore, EVH should be considered as the standard of care for saphenous vein harvest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17705081     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-007-9522-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  16 in total

1.  Endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest: a comparison of postoperative wound complications.

Authors:  Jerene M Bitondo; Willard M Daggett; David F Torchiana; Cary W Akins; Alan D Hilgenberg; Gus J Vlahakes; Joren C Madsen; Thomas E MacGillivray; Arvind K Agnihotri
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  A prospective randomized trial of endoscopic versus conventional harvesting of the saphenous vein in coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  Bob Kiaii; Byung C Moon; David Massel; Yves Langlois; Thomas W Austin; Andrea Willoughby; C Guiraudon; Craig R Howard; L Ray Guo
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Endoscopic greater saphenous vein harvesting reduces the morbidity of coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  Chance D Felisky; Daniel L Paull; Mark E Hill; R Alan Hall; Mary Ditkoff; William G Campbell; Steven W Guyton
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Endoscopic saphenous vein graft harvest for extracranial-intracranial bypass procedures.

Authors:  Michael J Alexander; Jennifer Perna
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  2005-06

5.  Should we use video-assisted endoscopic vein harvesting as a standard technique?

Authors:  I E Rodrigus; B Stockman; B J Amsel; A C Moulijn
Journal:  Heart Surg Forum       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 0.676

6.  Risk factors for leg wound complications following endoscopic versus traditional saphenous vein harvesting.

Authors:  K B Allen; D A Heimansohn; R J Robison; J J Schier; G L Griffith; E B Fitzgerald; J H Isch; S Abraham; C J Shaar
Journal:  Heart Surg Forum       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 0.676

7.  Randomized trial of endoscopic versus open vein harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting: six-month patency rates.

Authors:  Kwok L Yun; YingXing Wu; Vicken Aharonian; Prakash Mansukhani; Thomas A Pfeffer; Colleen F Sintek; Gary S Kochamba; Gary Grunkemeier; Siavosh Khonsari
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Carbon dioxide embolism during endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting in coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  Tzu-Yu Lin; Kuan-Ming Chiu; Ming-Jiuh Wang; Shu-Hsun Chu
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 9.  Endoscopic vein harvesting in cardiac surgery.

Authors:  P Brian Seabolt; Michael J Reardon
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.161

10.  Endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting for CABG -- a randomized, prospective trial.

Authors:  U P Schurr; M L Lachat; O Reuthebuch; A Kadner; M Mäder; B Seiffert; S P Hoerstrup; G Zünd; M Genoni; M I Turina
Journal:  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.827

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Videoscope-assisted cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Kuan-Ming Chiu; Robert Jeen-Chen Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Endoscopic vein harvesting for coronary bypass grafting: a blessing or a trojan horse?

Authors:  Ryan Accord; Jos Maessen
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2011-03-20       Impact factor: 1.866

Review 3.  A comprehensive review on learning curve associated problems in endoscopic vein harvesting and the requirement for a standardised training programme.

Authors:  Bhuvaneswari Krishnamoorthy; William R Critchley; Rajamiyer V Venkateswaran; James Barnard; Ann Caress; James E Fildes; Nizar Yonan
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 1.637

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.