Literature DB >> 17704444

Blood pressure, volume, and sodium control in an automated peritoneal dialysis population.

Neil C Boudville1, Peter Cordy, Kristie Millman, Laura Fairbairn, Ajay Sharma, Robert Lindsay, Peter G Blake.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the control of blood pressure and volume, and the role of sodium removal in a single, large, contemporary, automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) population where icodextrin is used liberally and there is a policy to avoid long duration glucose-based daytime dwells.
DESIGN: Observational cross-sectional study.
SETTING: A university hospital. PATIENTS: 56 APD patients, with a mean duration on peritoneal dialysis of 1.9 years; 50% were prescribed icodextrin. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Blood pressure, extracellular water volume (ECW)-to-intracellular water volume (ICW) ratio, and total (peritoneal and urinary) sodium removal.
RESULTS: Sodium Removal: Mean total sodium removal, while low at 102.9 +/- 64.6 mmol/day, showed a wide range, with 41% having a sodium removal of >120 mmol/day. Total sodium removal correlated with total body water, ECW, and ICW (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.025, respectively), as well as with height and weight (p < 0.06, p < 0.01 respectively). On multivariate analysis, only ultrafiltration volume and urine volume were significantly associated with total sodium removal (r(2) = 0.67, p < 0.0001 for both). There was also a correlation between sodium removal and urea nitrogen appearance (r(2) = 0.31, p < 0.001), with urea nitrogen appearance in turn being closely correlated with ICW (p < 0.001). Volume Status: The ECW/ICW ratio was 0.88 +/- 0.17, which was not significantly different to that found in hemodialysis patients without clinical evidence of fluid overload, either predialysis (0.96 +/- 0.16) or postdialysis (0.92 +/- 0.16); p = 0.07 and 0.36 respectively. Blood Pressure: Mean +/- standard deviation systolic blood pressure (BP) was 111.9 +/- 18.2 mmHg and diastolic BP was 63.3 +/- 11.9 mmHg, with only 4 (7%) patients having a systolic BP > 140 mmHg and 1 (2%) having a diastolic BP > 80 mmHg. Median number of antihypertensives was 1 per day. Blood pressure control and ECW/ICW ratio were similar in those with sodium removal >120 mmol/day compared to those with sodium removal < or =120 mmol/day (p = 0.39 for SBP, p = 0.70 for diastolic BP, p = 0.24 for ECW/ICW).
CONCLUSIONS: We have shown that good blood pressure and volume control is achievable in a large contemporary APD population with liberal use of icodextrin and avoidance of long daytime glucose-based dwells. Neither low nor high sodium removal was associated with more frequent hypertension or volume expansion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17704444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perit Dial Int        ISSN: 0896-8608            Impact factor:   1.756


  10 in total

1.  The Effect of Fluid Overload on Clinical Outcome in Southern Chinese Patients Undergoing Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis.

Authors:  Qunying Guo; Jianxiong Lin; Jianying Li; Chunyan Yi; Haiping Mao; Xiao Yang; Xueqing Yu
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  Icodextrin Simplifies PD Therapy by Equalizing UF and Sodium Removal Among Patient Transport Types During Long Dwells: A Modeling Study.

Authors:  Alp Akonur; James Sloand; Ira Davis; John Leypoldt
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 1.756

3.  Sodium removal by peritoneal dialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Silvio Borrelli; Vincenzo La Milia; Luca De Nicola; Gianfranca Cabiddu; Roberto Russo; Michele Provenzano; Roberto Minutolo; Giuseppe Conte; Carlo Garofalo
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 3.902

Review 4.  Comparative outcomes between continuous ambulatory and automated peritoneal dialysis: a narrative review.

Authors:  Scott D Bieber; John Burkart; Thomas A Golper; Isaac Teitelbaum; Rajnish Mehrotra
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 8.860

5.  Comparison of volume overload with cycler-assisted versus continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Sara N Davison; Gian S Jhangri; Kailash Jindal; Neesh Pannu
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 8.237

6.  Hyponatremia in peritoneal dialysis: epidemiology in a single center and correlation with clinical and biochemical parameters.

Authors:  Chrysostomos Dimitriadis; Nigar Sekercioglu; Chrysoula Pipili; Dimitrios Oreopoulos; Joanne M Bargman
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 7.  Assessment and management of hypertension in patients on dialysis.

Authors:  Rajiv Agarwal; Joseph Flynn; Velvie Pogue; Mahboob Rahman; Efrain Reisin; Matthew R Weir
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 10.121

8.  Clinical effects of icodextrin in peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Trijntje T Cnossen; Constantijn J Konings; Frank M van der Sande; Karel M Leunissen; Jeroen P Kooman
Journal:  NDT Plus       Date:  2008-10

9.  Prevalence and risk factors of fluid overload in Southern Chinese continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Qunying Guo; Chunyan Yi; Jianying Li; Xiaofeng Wu; Xiao Yang; Xueqing Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Blood pressure profile in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Rizna Abdul Cader; Halim Abdul Gafor; Rozita Mohd; Suriani Ibrahim; W H Wan Haslina; Arba'iyah Bain; Norella Ct Kong
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 4.068

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.