Literature DB >> 17703886

Emotional control of nociceptive reactions (ECON): do affective valence and arousal play a role?

Jamie L Rhudy1, Amy E Williams, Klanci M McCabe, Jennifer L Russell, Lauren J Maynard.   

Abstract

Prior research suggests emotional picture-viewing modulates motoric (nociceptive flexion reflex), autonomic (skin conductance response, heart rate acceleration), and subjective (pain rating) reactions to noxious electrodermal stimulation. The present study sought to determine whether emotional valence and arousal contribute to nociception modulation. To do so, pictures varying in emotional content (erotica, food, neutral, loss, attack) were chosen to manipulate emotional valence (pleasant=erotic and food; unpleasant=loss and attack) and arousal (low=food and loss; moderate=erotica and attack). Pictures were presented in pseudorandom order to elicit emotional processing while noxious electric stimulations were delivered to the sural nerve. Nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR) magnitude, skin conductance response (SCR), heart rate (HR) acceleration, and subjective pain ratings to each stimulation were measured, standardized, averaged by picture content, and analyzed. Results suggested that picture-viewing explained 52% of the variance in the multivariate combination of the nociceptive reactions and modulated them in parallel. Pleasant pictures inhibited reactions, whereas unpleasant pictures enhanced them. However, only erotica and attack pictures elicited significant modulation relative to neutral pictures, suggesting arousal also contributed. An exploratory multilevel analysis also supported this conclusion. Together, these data suggest emotional control of nociceptive reactions (ECON) is associated with a valence-by-arousal interaction. Implications of these findings for how emotional picture-viewing can be used to study supraspinal modulation are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17703886     DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.06.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  47 in total

Review 1.  The placebo effect: advances from different methodological approaches.

Authors:  Karin Meissner; Ulrike Bingel; Luana Colloca; Tor D Wager; Alison Watson; Magne Arve Flaten
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  The role of positive affect in pain and its treatment.

Authors:  Patrick H Finan; Eric L Garland
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.442

3.  [The mutual influence of pain and emotion processing].

Authors:  P Reicherts; A B M Gerdes; P Pauli; M J Wieser
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.107

4.  Emotional Modulation of Pain and Spinal Nociception in Sexual Assault Survivors.

Authors:  Natalie Hellman; Bethany L Kuhn; Edward W Lannon; Michael F Payne; Cassandra A Sturycz; Shreela Palit; Joanna O Shadlow; Jamie L Rhudy
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2018 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 4.312

Review 5.  The relation of emotions to placebo responses.

Authors:  Magne Arve Flaten; Per M Aslaksen; Peter S Lyby; Espen Bjørkedal
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Reliability and validity of a brief method to assess nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR) threshold.

Authors:  Jamie L Rhudy; Christopher R France
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 5.820

7.  Pain modulation by your partner: An experimental investigation from a social-affective perspective.

Authors:  Katrin Hillmer; Judith Kappesser; Christiane Hermann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Emotional disclosure interventions for chronic pain: from the laboratory to the clinic.

Authors:  Mark A Lumley; Elyse R Sklar; Jennifer N Carty
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  Placebo analgesia and reward processing: integrating genetics, personality, and intrinsic brain activity.

Authors:  Rongjun Yu; Randy L Gollub; Mark Vangel; Ted Kaptchuk; Jordan W Smoller; Jian Kong
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Endogenous inhibition of somatic pain is impaired in girls with irritable bowel syndrome compared with healthy girls.

Authors:  Amy E Williams; Margaret Heitkemper; Mariella M Self; Danita I Czyzewski; Robert J Shulman
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 5.820

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.