Literature DB >> 17703504

Determinants of skin sensitisation potential.

David W Roberts1, Aynur O Aptula.   

Abstract

Skin sensitisation is an important toxicological endpoint. The possibility that chemicals used in the workplace and in consumer products might cause skin sensitisation is a major concern for individuals, for employers and for marketing. In European REACH (Registration, Evaluation, and Authorisation of Chemicals) legislation, the sensitising potential should therefore be assessed for chemicals below the 10 ton threshold. Development of methods for prediction of skin sensitisation potential without animal testing has been an active research area for some time, but has received further impetus with the advent of REACH and the EU Cosmetics Directive (EU 2003). This paper addresses the issue of non-animal based prediction of sensitisation by a mechanistic approach. It is known that the sequence of molecular, biomolecular and cellular events between exposure to a skin sensitiser and development of the sensitised state involves several stages, in particular penetration through the stratum corneum, covalent binding to carrier protein, migration of Langerhans cells, presentation of the antigen to naïve T-cells. In this paper each of these stages is considered with respect to the extent to which it is dependent on the chemical properties of the sensitiser. The evidence suggests that, although penetration of the stratum corneum, stimulation of migration and maturation of Langerhans cells, and antigen recognition are important events in the induction of sensitisation, except in certain specific circumstances they can be taken for granted. They are not important factors in determining whether a compound will be a sensitiser or not, nor are they important factors in determining how potent one sensitiser will be relative to another. The ability to bind covalently to carrier protein is the major structure-dependent determinant of skin sensitisation potential. A chemistry-based prediction strategy is proposed involving reaction mechanistic domain assignment, reactivity and hydrophobicity determination, and application of quantitative mechanistic modelling (QMM) or read-across.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17703504     DOI: 10.1002/jat.1289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Toxicol        ISSN: 0260-437X            Impact factor:   3.446


  14 in total

1.  Application of IATA - A case study in evaluating the global and local performance of a Bayesian network model for skin sensitization.

Authors:  J M Fitzpatrick; G Patlewicz
Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 3.000

2.  Navigating through the minefield of read-across tools: A review of in silico tools for grouping.

Authors:  Patlewicz Grace; Helman George; Pradeep Prachi; Shah Imran
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2017-08

3.  Predicting chemically-induced skin reactions. Part I: QSAR models of skin sensitization and their application to identify potentially hazardous compounds.

Authors:  Vinicius M Alves; Eugene Muratov; Denis Fourches; Judy Strickland; Nicole Kleinstreuer; Carolina H Andrade; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2015-01-03       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 4.  Early immune events in the induction of allergic contact dermatitis.

Authors:  Daniel H Kaplan; Botond Z Igyártó; Anthony A Gaspari
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 53.106

5.  JNJ7777120 Ameliorates Inflammatory and Oxidative Manifestations in a Murine Model of Contact Hypersensitivity via Modulation of TLR and Nrf2 Signaling.

Authors:  Ahmed F Mohamed; Mohammed F El-Yamany; Fatma A El-Batrawy; Mohamed T Abdel-Aziz
Journal:  Inflammation       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 4.092

Review 6.  Pathomechanisms of Contact Sensitization.

Authors:  Philipp R Esser; Stefan F Martin
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 4.806

7.  Skin sensitization in silico protocol.

Authors:  Candice Johnson; Ernst Ahlberg; Lennart T Anger; Lisa Beilke; Romualdo Benigni; Joel Bercu; Sol Bobst; David Bower; Alessandro Brigo; Sarah Campbell; Mark T D Cronin; Ian Crooks; Kevin P Cross; Tatyana Doktorova; Thomas Exner; David Faulkner; Ian M Fearon; Markus Fehr; Shayne C Gad; Véronique Gervais; Amanda Giddings; Susanne Glowienke; Barry Hardy; Catrin Hasselgren; Jedd Hillegass; Robert Jolly; Eckart Krupp; Liat Lomnitski; Jason Magby; Jordi Mestres; Lawrence Milchak; Scott Miller; Wolfgang Muster; Louise Neilson; Rahul Parakhia; Alexis Parenty; Patricia Parris; Alexandre Paulino; Ana Theresa Paulino; David W Roberts; Harald Schlecker; Reinhard Stidl; Diana Suarez-Rodrigez; David T Szabo; Raymond R Tice; Daniel Urbisch; Anna Vuorinen; Brian Wall; Thibaud Weiler; Angela T White; Jessica Whritenour; Joerg Wichard; David Woolley; Craig Zwickl; Glenn J Myatt
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.271

8.  Integrated decision strategies for skin sensitization hazard.

Authors:  Judy Strickland; Qingda Zang; Nicole Kleinstreuer; Michael Paris; David M Lehmann; Neepa Choksi; Joanna Matheson; Abigail Jacobs; Anna Lowit; David Allen; Warren Casey
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 3.446

9.  Metabolism of the antibacterial triclocarban by human epidermal keratinocytes to yield protein adducts.

Authors:  Nils Helge Schebb; Bruce A Buchholz; Bruce D Hammock; Robert H Rice
Journal:  J Biochem Mol Toxicol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.642

10.  Reactivity measurement in estimation of benzoquinone and benzoquinone derivatives' allergenicity.

Authors:  Wilbes Mbiya; Itai Chipinda; Reuben H Simoyi; Paul D Siegel
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 4.221

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.