BACKGROUND: Gonorrhoea is an important cause of sexual ill health and is concentrated in geographical areas and demographic groups. This study explores the distribution of gonorrhoea across London. METHODS: Epidemiological data on all gonorrhoea cases were collected from 13 major genitourinary clinics in London between 1 June and 30 November 2004. Samples were stored centrally and typed using NG-MAST. The postcode of each case's main residence was used to calculate incidence of gonorrhoea by borough using data from the UK 2001 census and a population survey on residence of men who have sex with men (MSM). RESULTS: 2,891 cases were confirmed, 1,822 of which had postcode data, resided in London, and had their strain successfully typed. There was a very high incidence of gonorrhoea in MSM (1,834 per 100,000 population) and heterosexuals of black ethnicity (392 per 100,000). The incidence among heterosexuals was highest in City of London (390 per 100,000, 95% CI 213 to 566), Southwark (308 per 100,000, 95% CI 280 to 336), Hackney (284 per 100,000, 95% CI 254 to 313), and Lambeth (216 per 100,000, 95% CI 194 to 239) and was not associated with measures of social deprivation (correlation coefficient = 0.0008, p = 0.97) but was strongly associated with black ethnicity (correlation coefficient = 0.48, p = 0.01). 45% of cases had one of the 21 major strains; eight of these strains were significantly clustered geographically and persisted for a shorter duration than those that were not clustered. Patients travelled a mean of 7.7 km from their home to the clinic. CONCLUSIONS: High gonorrhoea incidence in London is observed in MSM and heterosexuals of black ethnicity. Endemic strains in both MSM and heterosexuals are diagnosed at multiple clinics. Interventions, including partner notification, must therefore operate between clinics.
BACKGROUND:Gonorrhoea is an important cause of sexual ill health and is concentrated in geographical areas and demographic groups. This study explores the distribution of gonorrhoea across London. METHODS: Epidemiological data on all gonorrhoea cases were collected from 13 major genitourinary clinics in London between 1 June and 30 November 2004. Samples were stored centrally and typed using NG-MAST. The postcode of each case's main residence was used to calculate incidence of gonorrhoea by borough using data from the UK 2001 census and a population survey on residence of men who have sex with men (MSM). RESULTS: 2,891 cases were confirmed, 1,822 of which had postcode data, resided in London, and had their strain successfully typed. There was a very high incidence of gonorrhoea in MSM (1,834 per 100,000 population) and heterosexuals of black ethnicity (392 per 100,000). The incidence among heterosexuals was highest in City of London (390 per 100,000, 95% CI 213 to 566), Southwark (308 per 100,000, 95% CI 280 to 336), Hackney (284 per 100,000, 95% CI 254 to 313), and Lambeth (216 per 100,000, 95% CI 194 to 239) and was not associated with measures of social deprivation (correlation coefficient = 0.0008, p = 0.97) but was strongly associated with black ethnicity (correlation coefficient = 0.48, p = 0.01). 45% of cases had one of the 21 major strains; eight of these strains were significantly clustered geographically and persisted for a shorter duration than those that were not clustered. Patients travelled a mean of 7.7 km from their home to the clinic. CONCLUSIONS: High gonorrhoea incidence in London is observed in MSM and heterosexuals of black ethnicity. Endemic strains in both MSM and heterosexuals are diagnosed at multiple clinics. Interventions, including partner notification, must therefore operate between clinics.
Authors: Nancy Krieger; Pamela D Waterman; Jarvis T Chen; Mah-Jabeen Soobader; S V Subramanian Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2003 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Iona M C Martin; Catherine A Ison; David M Aanensen; Kevin A Fenton; Brian G Spratt Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2004-03-31 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: A M Johnson; C H Mercer; B Erens; A J Copas; S McManus; K Wellings; K A Fenton; C Korovessis; W Macdowall; K Nanchahal; S Purdon; J Field Journal: Lancet Date: 2001-12-01 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Bhudipa Choudhury; Claire L Risley; Azra C Ghani; Cynthia J Bishop; Helen Ward; Kevin A Fenton; Catherine A Ison; Brian G Spratt Journal: Lancet Date: 2006-07-08 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Carolien M Wind; Henry J C de Vries; Maarten F Schim van der Loeff; Magnus Unemo; Alje P van Dam Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2015-04-01 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Hannelore M Götz; Louise Aam van Oeffelen; Christian J P A Hoebe; Birgit Hb van Benthem Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-01-21 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Ashleigh B Sullivan; Dionne C Gesink; Patrick Brown; Lutong Zhou; Jay S Kaufman; Molly Fitch; Marc L Serre; William C Miller Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 3.797