Literature DB >> 17701060

The impact of surgical wait time on patient-based outcomes in posterior lumbar spinal surgery.

Jason Braybrooke1, Henry Ahn, Aimee Gallant, Michael Ford, Yigel Bronstein, Joel Finkelstein, Albert Yee.   

Abstract

A prospective observational study was conducted on patients undergoing posterior lumbar spine surgery for degenerative spinal disorders. The study purpose was to evaluate the effect of wait time to surgery on patient derived generic and disease specific functional outcome following surgery. A prolonged wait to surgery may adversely affect surgical outcome. Although there is literature on the effect of wait time to surgery in surgical fields such as oncology, cardiac, opthamologic, and total joint arthroplasty, little is known regarding the effect of wait time to surgery as it pertains to the spinal surgical population. Consecutive patients undergoing elective posterior lumbar spinal surgery for degenerative disorders were recruited. Short-Form 36 and Oswestry disability questionnaires were administered (pre-operatively, and at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year post-operatively). Patients completed a questionnaire regarding their experience with the wait time to surgery. The study cohort consisted of 70 patients with follow-up in 53/70 (76%). Time intervals from the onset of patient symptoms to initial consultation by family physician through investigations, spinal surgical consultation and surgery were quantified. Time intervals were compared to patient specific improvements in reported outcome following surgery using Cox Regression analysis. The effect of patient and surgical parameters on wait time was evaluated using the median time as a reference for those patients who had either a longer or shorter wait. Significant improvements in patient derived outcome were observed comparing post-operative to pre-operative baseline scores. The greatest improvements were observed in aspects relating to physical function and pain. A longer wait to surgery was associated with less improvement in outcome following surgery (SF-36 domains of BP, GH, RP, VT). A longer wait time to surgery negatively influences the results of posterior lumbar spinal surgery for degenerative conditions as quantified by patient derived functional outcome measures. The parameters of pain severity and physical aspects of function appear to be the most significantly affected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17701060      PMCID: PMC2223329          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0452-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  19 in total

Review 1.  Surgery for lumbar disc prolapse.

Authors:  J N Gibson; I C Grant; G Waddell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2000

Review 2.  The role of economic evaluation in setting priorities for elective surgery.

Authors:  J Coast
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 3.  Surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylosis.

Authors:  J N Gibson; G Waddell; I C Grant
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2000

4.  Lack of congruence in the ratings of patients' health status by patients and their physicians.

Authors:  M E Suarez-Almazor; B Conner-Spady; C J Kendall; A S Russell; K Skeith
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Delays worsen quality of life outcome of primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Donald S Garbuz; Min Xu; Clive P Duncan; Bassam A Masri; Boris Sobolev
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Health-related quality of life and mobility of patients awaiting elective total hip arthroplasty: a prospective study.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Mahon; Robert B Bourne; Cecil H Rorabeck; David H Feeny; Larry Stitt; Susan Webster-Bogaert
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-11-12       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  The impact of health status on waiting time for major joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  K D Kelly; D Voaklander; G Kramer; D W Johnston; L Redfern; M E Suarez-Almazor
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Do you see what I see? Looking at scoliosis surgical outcomes through orthopedists' eyes.

Authors:  Renee Buchanan; John G Birch; Anne A Morton; Richard H Browne
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Waiting for total hip arthroplasty: avoidable loss in quality time and preventable deterioration.

Authors:  Marieke Ostendorf; Erik Buskens; Henk van Stel; Augustus Schrijvers; Louis Marting; Wouter Dhert; Abraham Verbout
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  The related outcome and complication rate in primary lumbar microscopic disc surgery depending on the surgeon's experience: comparative studies.

Authors:  Matthias Wiese; Jürgen Krämer; Kai Bernsmann; Roland Ernst Willburger
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.166

View more
  21 in total

1.  Does the wait for lumbar degenerative spinal stenosis surgery have a detrimental effect on patient outcomes? A prospective observational study.

Authors:  Christopher S Bailey; Kevin R Gurr; Stewart I Bailey; David Taylor; M Patricia Rosas-Arellano; Corinne Tallon; Yves Bureau; Jennifer C Urquhart
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2016-04-28

2.  A spinal triage programme delivered by physiotherapists in collaboration with orthopaedic surgeons.

Authors:  Brenna Bath; Stacey Lovo Grona; Bonnie Janzen
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.037

3.  Is referral to a spine surgeon a double-edged sword?: patient concerns before consultation.

Authors:  Biniam Kidane; Rajiv Gandhi; Angela Sarro; Taufik A Valiante; Bart J Harvey; Y Raja Rampersaud
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 4.  A survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2007.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Improving spine surgical access, appropriateness and efficiency in metropolitan, urban and rural settings.

Authors:  Mohammad Zarrabian; Andrew Bidos; Caroline Fanti; Barry Young; Brian Drew; David Puskas; Raja Rampersaud
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Step activity monitoring in lumbar stenosis patients undergoing decompressive surgery.

Authors:  Tobias L Schulte; Tim Schubert; Corinna Winter; Mirko Brandes; Lars Hackenberg; Hansdetlef Wassmann; Dennis Liem; Dieter Rosenbaum; Viola Bullmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Comparison of lifetime incremental cost:utility ratios of surgery relative to failed medical management for the treatment of hip, knee and spine osteoarthritis modelled using 2-year postsurgical values.

Authors:  Peggy Tso; Kevin Walker; Nizar Mahomed; Peter C Coyte; Y Raja Rampersaud
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Relationship between spinal magnetic resonance imaging findings and candidacy for spinal surgery.

Authors:  Frederick Cheng; John You; Y Raja Rampersaud
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  Transforaminal epidural steroid injections prevent the need for surgery in patients with sciatica secondary to lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective case series.

Authors:  Neil A Manson; Melissa D McKeon; Edward P Abraham
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of a reduction in diagnostic imaging in degenerative spinal disorders.

Authors:  Joanne S M Kim; Joyce Z Dong; Stacey Brener; Peter C Coyte; Y Raja Rampersaud
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2011-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.