M A Hook1, J W Grau. 1. Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4235, USA.
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Review of how spinal neurons can modulate the consequences of functional electrical stimulation (FES) in an animal model. METHODS: Spinal effects of FES are examined in male Sprague-Dawley rats transected at the second thoracic vertebra. The rats are exposed to FES training 24-48 h after surgery. Experimental manipulations of stimulation parameters, combined with physiological and pharmacological procedures, are used to examine the potential role of spinal neurons. RESULTS: The isolated spinal cord is inherently capable of learning the response-outcome relations imposed in FES training contingencies. Adaptive behavioral modifications are observed when an outcome (electrical stimulation) is contingent on a behavioral response. In contrast, a lack of correlation between the response and outcome in training produces a learning deficit in the spinal cord, rendering it incapable of adaptive learning for up to 48 h. The N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor appears to mediate both the adaptive plasticity and loss of plasticity, seen in this spinal model. CONCLUSION: The behavioral effects observed with FES therapies are not simply due to the direct (motor) consequences of stimulation elicited by the activation of efferent motor neurons and/or selected muscles. FES training has the capacity to shape inherent spinal circuits and to produce a long-lasting behavioral modification. Further understanding of the spinal mechanisms underlying adaptive behavioral modification will be integral for establishing functional neural connections in a regenerating spinal system.
STUDY DESIGN: Review of how spinal neurons can modulate the consequences of functional electrical stimulation (FES) in an animal model. METHODS: Spinal effects of FES are examined in male Sprague-Dawley rats transected at the second thoracic vertebra. The rats are exposed to FES training 24-48 h after surgery. Experimental manipulations of stimulation parameters, combined with physiological and pharmacological procedures, are used to examine the potential role of spinal neurons. RESULTS: The isolated spinal cord is inherently capable of learning the response-outcome relations imposed in FES training contingencies. Adaptive behavioral modifications are observed when an outcome (electrical stimulation) is contingent on a behavioral response. In contrast, a lack of correlation between the response and outcome in training produces a learning deficit in the spinal cord, rendering it incapable of adaptive learning for up to 48 h. The N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor appears to mediate both the adaptive plasticity and loss of plasticity, seen in this spinal model. CONCLUSION: The behavioral effects observed with FES therapies are not simply due to the direct (motor) consequences of stimulation elicited by the activation of efferent motor neurons and/or selected muscles. FES training has the capacity to shape inherent spinal circuits and to produce a long-lasting behavioral modification. Further understanding of the spinal mechanisms underlying adaptive behavioral modification will be integral for establishing functional neural connections in a regenerating spinal system.
Authors: James W Grau; Eric D Crown; Adam R Ferguson; Stephanie N Washburn; Michelle A Hook; Rajesh C Miranda Journal: Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev Date: 2006-12
Authors: J R Huie; S M Garraway; K M Baumbauer; K C Hoy; B S Beas; K S Montgomery; J L Bizon; J W Grau Journal: Neuroscience Date: 2011-10-25 Impact factor: 3.590
Authors: James W Grau; Yung-Jen Huang; Joel D Turtle; Misty M Strain; Rajesh C Miranda; Sandra M Garraway; Michelle A Hook Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2016-12-20 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Will L Johnson; Devin L Jindrich; Hui Zhong; Roland R Roy; V Reggie Edgerton Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2011-01-17 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Devin L Jindrich; M Selvan Joseph; Chad K Otoshi; Robert Y Wei; Hui Zhong; Roland R Roy; Niranjala J K Tillakaratne; V Reggie Edgerton Journal: J Neurosci Methods Date: 2009-06-09 Impact factor: 2.390