Literature DB >> 11495955

Preserving and restoring behavioral potential within the spinal cord using an instrumental training paradigm.

E D Crown1, J W Grau.   

Abstract

We have shown that spinal cord neurons can support a simple form of instrumental learning. In a typical experiment, rats are spinalized at the second thoracic vertebra (T(2)) and given shock to one hindleg. One group (master) receives shock whenever the leg is extended. This response-contingent shock causes an increase in response duration that decreases net shock exposure. This instrumental learning is not observed in yoked controls that receive the same amount of shock independent of leg position (noncontingent shock). Interestingly, rats that have received noncontingent shock also fail to learn when they are subsequently exposed to response-contingent shock on either the ipsilateral or contralateral leg. Just 6 min of noncontingent nociceptive stimulation, applied to the leg or tail, undermines behavioral potential for up to 48 h. The present experiments explore whether a behavioral therapy can prevent and/or reverse this deficit. In experiment 1, spinalized rats received 30 min of training with contingent shock, noncontingent shock, or nothing prior to noncontingent tailshock. They were then tested with contingent shock to the contralateral hindleg. Rats that had received noncontingent shock alone failed to learn. Prior exposure to contingent shock had an immunizing effect that prevented the deficit. Experiment 2 examined whether training with contingent shock after noncontingent shock exposure would restore behavioral potential. To facilitate performance during contingent shock training, subjects were given an intrathecal injection of the opioid antagonist naltrexone, a drug treatment that temporarily blocks the expression of the behavioral deficit. Twenty-four hours later subjects were tested with contingent shock on either the ipsilateral or contralateral leg. We found that naltrexone combined with contingent shock therapy restored spinal cord function. Naltrexone alone had no effect. The results suggest that noncontingent nociceptive stimulation can undermine behavioral potential after spinal cord injury and that instrumental training can help preserve, and protect, spinal cord function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11495955     DOI: 10.1152/jn.2001.86.2.845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  25 in total

Review 1.  Learning to promote recovery after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  James W Grau; Rachel E Baine; Paris A Bean; Jacob A Davis; Gizelle N Fauss; Melissa K Henwood; Kelsey E Hudson; David T Johnston; Megan M Tarbet; Misty M Strain
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 5.330

2.  Two chronic motor training paradigms differentially influence acute instrumental learning in spinally transected rats.

Authors:  Allison J Bigbee; Eric D Crown; Adam R Ferguson; Roland R Roy; Niranjala J K Tillakaratne; James W Grau; V Reggie Edgerton
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-25       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Brain-derived neurotrophic factor promotes adaptive plasticity within the spinal cord and mediates the beneficial effects of controllable stimulation.

Authors:  J R Huie; S M Garraway; K M Baumbauer; K C Hoy; B S Beas; K S Montgomery; J L Bizon; J W Grau
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Timing in the absence of supraspinal input III: regularly spaced cutaneous stimulation prevents and reverses the spinal learning deficit produced by peripheral inflammation.

Authors:  Kyle M Baumbauer; James W Grau
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.912

5.  BDNF and learning: Evidence that instrumental training promotes learning within the spinal cord by up-regulating BDNF expression.

Authors:  F Gómez-Pinilla; J R Huie; Z Ying; A R Ferguson; E D Crown; K M Baumbauer; V R Edgerton; J W Grau
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Opioid regulation of spinal cord plasticity: evidence the kappa-2 opioid receptor agonist GR89696 inhibits learning within the rat spinal cord.

Authors:  Stephanie N Washburn; Marissa L Maultsby; Denise A Puga; James W Grau
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 2.877

7.  Timing in the absence of supraspinal input I: variable, but not fixed, spaced stimulation of the sciatic nerve undermines spinally-mediated instrumental learning.

Authors:  K M Baumbauer; K C Hoy; J R Huie; A J Hughes; S A Woller; D A Puga; B Setlow; J W Grau
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Peripheral inflammation undermines the plasticity of the isolated spinal cord.

Authors:  Michelle A Hook; John R Huie; James W Grau
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.912

9.  Timing in the absence of supraspinal input II: regularly spaced stimulation induces a lasting alteration in spinal function that depends on the NMDA receptor, BDNF release, and protein synthesis.

Authors:  Kyle M Baumbauer; John R Huie; Abbey J Hughes; James W Grau
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Evidence That the Central Nervous System Can Induce a Modification at the Neuromuscular Junction That Contributes to the Maintenance of a Behavioral Response.

Authors:  Kevin C Hoy; Misty M Strain; Joel D Turtle; Kuan H Lee; J Russell Huie; John J Hartman; Megan M Tarbet; Mark L Harlow; David S K Magnuson; James W Grau
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.