Literature DB >> 17700332

Why measurement matters for measuring patient vision outcomes.

Trudy Mallinson1.   

Abstract

Optometrists, by definition, care deeply about measurement. This brief review article considers the essential features of measurement that make many optometric instruments so useful and how patient-centered survey instruments such as vision-related quality of life questionnaires, can be analyzed using contemporary psychometric methods, so that they also conform to these essential features of measurement. These features include unidimensionality, hierarchical order, and equal interval scaling. Optometrists demand these features because they need to make meaningful comparisons both between patients and over time. Questionnaires about visual function or health-related quality of life, typically involve a series of rating scale type items that are added up to produce a total raw score. Yet total raw scores, which are ordinal, do not exhibit the essential properties of measurement. The Rasch Model, developed by Georg Rasch in 1956, converts ordinal-level raw score data into interval measures that demonstrate the essential features of measurement. Under the Rasch model any obtained score (response) is conceptualized as the difference between the amount of a trait reflected in an item, i.e., how "hard" the item is, and the ability of the person responding to the item. The Rasch model estimates the log odds probability (logit) for any response by any person. Logits are equal interval, representing equal amounts of the construct being measured across the entire range of the construct. Logits define the hierarchical order of items, how hard or easy items are, and the Rasch model specifies that this order of items must be invariant for all persons, that is, must be unidimensional. There are numerous software packages available for applying the Rasch model, all provide methods for evaluating how well data demonstrate unidimensionality, hierarchical order, and equal interval scaling. These can be used in the development, assessment or revision of questionnaires to optimize measurement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17700332     DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181339f44

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  26 in total

1.  A new look at the WHOQOL as health-related quality of life instrument among visually impaired people using Rasch analysis.

Authors:  Vijaya K Gothwal; Marmamula Srinivas; Gullapalli N Rao
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Assessment of the psychometric properties of the Chinese Impact of Vision Impairment questionnaire in a population-based study: findings from the Singapore Chinese Eye Study.

Authors:  Eva K Fenwick; Peng Guan Ong; Charumathi Sabanayagam; Gwyn Rees; Jing Xie; Edith Holloway; Ching-Yu Cheng; Tien Y Wong; Blanche Lim; Pok Chien Tan; Ecosse L Lamoureux
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Adding access to a video magnifier to standard vision rehabilitation: initial results on reading performance and well-being from a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Mary Lou Jackson; Kimberly A Schoessow; Alexandra Selivanova; Jennifer Wallis
Journal:  Digit J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-03-31

4.  The impact of the severity of vision loss on vision-specific functioning in a German outpatient population - an observational study.

Authors:  Robert P Finger; Eva Fenwick; Peggy Pei-Chia Chiang; Michael Petrak; Frank G Holz; Manjula Marella; Ecosse L Lamoureux
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Measurement of Perceived Stress in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Authors:  Bradley E Dougherty; San-San L Cooley; Frederick H Davidorf
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Different impact of early and late stages irreversible eye diseases on vision-specific quality of life domains.

Authors:  Preeti Gupta; Eva K Fenwick; Ryan E K Man; Alfred T L Gan; Charumathi Sabanayagam; Debra Quek; Chaoxu Qian; Chui Ming Gemmy Cheung; Ching-Yu Cheng; Ecosse L Lamoureux
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Myopia, contact lens use and self-esteem.

Authors:  Lynette Dias; Ruth E Manny; Erik Weissberg; Karen D Fern
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Validation of the Glaucoma Quality of Life-15 Questionnaire in Serbian language.

Authors:  Ivan Sencanic; Tatjana Gazibara; Jelena Dotlic; Miroslav Stamenkovic; Vesna Jaksic; Marija Bozic; Anita Grgurevic
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

9.  Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life in Strabismus: A Modification of the Adult Strabismus-20 (AS-20) Questionnaire Using Rasch Analysis.

Authors:  Vijaya K Gothwal; Seelam Bharani; Ramesh Kekunnaya; PreetiPatil Chhablani; Virender Sachdeva; Niranjan K Pehere; Asa Narasaiah; Rekha Gunturu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The importance of rating scales in measuring patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Jyoti Khadka; Vijaya K Gothwal; Colm McAlinden; Ecosse L Lamoureux; Konrad Pesudovs
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.