Literature DB >> 30364180

Validation of the Glaucoma Quality of Life-15 Questionnaire in Serbian language.

Ivan Sencanic1, Tatjana Gazibara2, Jelena Dotlic3, Miroslav Stamenkovic1,4, Vesna Jaksic1,3, Marija Bozic3,5, Anita Grgurevic2.   

Abstract

AIM: To translate the Glaucoma Quality of Life-15 (GQL-15) to Serbian language and asses its validity and reliability in the population of Serbian patients.
METHODS: The study included 177 glaucoma patients. Clinical parameters (visual acuity, mean defect and square root of loss variance of visual field) and socio-demographic data were collected. Patients were stratified according to the Nelson's glaucoma staging system as mild, moderate and advanced glaucoma. All patients filled out the GQL-15 and National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ 25). The GQL-15 was translated following the internationally-accepted methodology, and its psychometric properties were assessed by using classical test theory and Rasch analysis.
RESULTS: The mean total score for the GQL-15 was 20.68±7.31. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the whole scale was 0.89 (central and near vision, α=0.24; peripheral vision, α=0.85; glare and dark adaptation, α=0.83). Factor analysis established 4 factors (70.3% of variance): two corresponding to the original factors and two new factors specific for the Serbian population. The GQL-15 score correlated positively with almost all clinical parameters and NEI-VFQ 25 proving good criterion validity. Correlation of the GQL-15 total score on test-retest confirmed appropriate scale reproducibility (ρ=0.96, P<0.001). The GQL-15 discriminated well advanced from mild and moderate glaucoma. In Rasch analysis we obtained adequate item (0.95) reliability index. Almost all items had infit and outfit mean squares in the accepted range.
CONCLUSION: Serbian version of the GQL-15 demonstrates adequate reliability and validity. This version of the GQL-15 is a valid instrument for evaluation of quality of life among Serbian speaking patients with glaucoma and can be applied in daily clinical work.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GQL-15; Serbian; glaucoma; scale validation

Year:  2018        PMID: 30364180      PMCID: PMC6192961          DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2018.10.16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  27 in total

1.  Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire.

Authors:  C M Mangione; P P Lee; P R Gutierrez; K Spritzer; S Berry; R D Hays
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-07

2.  Reengineering the glaucoma quality of life-15 questionnaire with rasch analysis.

Authors:  Jyoti Khadka; Konrad Pesudovs; Colm McAlinden; Michaela Vogel; Marcus Kernt; Christoph Hirneiss
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Cross-cultural validation of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire.

Authors:  Kaziwe Mollazadegan; Jinhai Huang; Jyoti Khadka; Qinmei Wang; Feng Yang; Rongrong Gao; Konrad Pesudovs
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  The importance of rating scale design in the measurement of patient-reported outcomes using questionnaires or item banks.

Authors:  Jyoti Khadka; Colm McAlinden; Vijaya K Gothwal; Ecosse L Lamoureux; Konrad Pesudovs
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Impact of bilateral open and closed-angle glaucoma on glaucoma-specific functioning in Asians.

Authors:  Bingsong Wang; Tin Aung; Manjula Marella; Yingfeng Zheng; Tien Y Wong; Shamira Perera; Tina T Wong; Ching-Lin Ho; Ecosse L Lamoureux
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2013 Apr-May       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Utility Analysis of Vision-related Quality of Life in Patients With Glaucoma and Different Perceptions from Ophthalmologists.

Authors:  Shaodan Zhang; Yuanbo Liang; Yanyun Chen; David C Musch; Chun Zhang; Ningli Wang
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  The Activities of Daily Vision Scale for cataract surgery outcomes: re-evaluating validity with Rasch analysis.

Authors:  Konrad Pesudovs; Estibaliz Garamendi; John P Keeves; David B Elliott
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 8.  The pathophysiology and treatment of glaucoma: a review.

Authors:  Robert N Weinreb; Tin Aung; Felipe A Medeiros
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) in Serbian patients.

Authors:  Bojan Kovac; Miroslav Vukosavljevic; Jelena Djokic Kovac; Mirko Resan; Goran Trajkovic; Janko Jankovic; Milena Smiljanic; Anita Grgurevic
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  A comparison of the NEIVFQ25 and GQL-15 questionnaires in Nigerian glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Chigozie A Mbadugha; Adeola O Onakoya; Olufisayo T Aribaba; Folashade B Akinsola
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-09-03
View more
  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of the association between macular damage and disability glare in patients with advanced glaucoma.

Authors:  Yun Hsia; Tsing-Hong Wang; Jehn-Yu Huang; Chien-Chia Su
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 2.  How do different lighting conditions affect the vision and quality of life of people with glaucoma? A systematic review.

Authors:  Jamie Enoch; Lee Jones; Deanna J Taylor; Carol Bronze; James F Kirwan; Pete R Jones; David P Crabb
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 3.775

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.