Literature DB >> 17700331

The development, assessment, and selection of questionnaires.

Konrad Pesudovs1, Jennifer M Burr, Clare Harley, David B Elliott.   

Abstract

Patient-reported outcome measurement has become accepted as an important component of comprehensive outcomes research. Researchers wishing to use a patient-reported measure must either develop their own questionnaire (called an instrument in the research literature) or choose from the myriad of instruments previously reported. This article summarizes how previously developed instruments are best assessed using a systematic process and we propose a system of quality assessment so that clinicians and researchers can determine whether there exists an appropriately developed and validated instrument that matches their particular needs. These quality assessment criteria may also be useful to guide new instrument development and refinement. We welcome debate over the appropriateness of these criteria as this will lead to the evolution of better quality assessment criteria and in turn better assessment of patient-reported outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17700331     DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318141fe75

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  89 in total

1.  Quality of life following surgery for congenital glaucoma: findings of the LVPEI congenital glaucoma registry.

Authors:  Vijaya K Gothwal; Bharani Seelam; Anil K Mandal
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Evaluation of the Adult Strabismus-20 (AS-20) questionnaire using Rasch analysis.

Authors:  David A Leske; Sarah R Hatt; Laura Liebermann; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  A new look at the WHOQOL as health-related quality of life instrument among visually impaired people using Rasch analysis.

Authors:  Vijaya K Gothwal; Marmamula Srinivas; Gullapalli N Rao
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  Patient-reported outcomes (PRO's) in glaucoma: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Vandenbroeck; S De Geest; T Zeyen; I Stalmans; F Dobbels
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Developing an item bank to measure the coping strategies of people with hereditary retinal diseases.

Authors:  Mallika Prem Senthil; Jyoti Khadka; John De Roach; Tina Lamey; Terri McLaren; Isabella Campbell; Eva K Fenwick; Ecosse L Lamoureux; Konrad Pesudovs
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  [The German version of the Visual Function and Corneal Health Status (V‑FUCHS): a Fuchs dystrophy-specific visual disability instrument].

Authors:  Viviane Grewing; Marianne Fritz; Claudia Müller; Daniel Böhringer; Thomas Reinhard; Sanjay V Patel; Katrin Wacker
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.059

7.  Comparison of scoring approaches for the NEI VFQ-25 in low vision.

Authors:  Bradley E Dougherty; Mark A Bullimore
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Rasch analysis of the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI).

Authors:  Bradley E Dougherty; Jason J Nichols; Kelly K Nichols
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Quality of life after pulmonary embolism: first cross-cultural evaluation of the pulmonary embolism quality-of-life (PEmb-QoL) questionnaire in a Norwegian cohort.

Authors:  Mazdak Tavoly; Lars-Petter Jelsness-Jørgensen; Hilde Skuterud Wik; Christina Roaldsnes; Per Morten Sandset; Waleed Ghanima
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Validation of the Food Allergy Quality of Life-Parental Burden Questionnaire in the UK.

Authors:  Rebecca C Knibb; Carol Stalker
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.